Closed mariadalfonso closed 1 year ago
Hello, For the HF variables, we are still optimizing the cuts (and at least one analysis is using the full variable in NANO). These variables however only apply for high pt HF jets so I suspect the size should be heavily compressed compared to usual Floats (?)
- [ ] the variables Jet_chFPV0EF, Jet_chFPV1EF,Jet_chFPV2EF,Jet_chFPV3EF can be moved to the JMEnano and removed from central
this is done in cms-sw/33824
noted
https://cms-nanoaod-integration.web.cern.ch/integration/pr31618/mc106Xul18_size_report.html#Jet
currently jet eta/phi are saved with high precision ~ 12 as leptons while the pt are redefined with precision 10
https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/540da10c5a27a2dadb0b06c28b5ca5db3a2f58f5/PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/jets_cff.py#L261 https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/540da10c5a27a2dadb0b06c28b5ca5db3a2f58f5/PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/jets_cff.py#L548
DQM
[ ] the SD mass is defined as positive so can restrict the range here https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/nanoDQM_cfi.py#L165
[ ] the SumET has a lot of underflow https://gouskos.web.cern.ch/gouskos/xpog/nanoaod-v9/puppimet/plots/RawPuppiMET_sumEt.pdf
[x] the variables Jet_chFPV0EF, Jet_chFPV1EF,Jet_chFPV2EF,Jet_chFPV3EF can be moved to the JMEnano and removed from central
Self-Documentation: