Closed kpedro88 closed 7 years ago
A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for branch master.
@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @gudrutis, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply. You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
external issue cms-sw/cmsdist#3576
I'm confused.
Shouldn't there be a warning also if the "topic" is based on a newer IB than the developer's area, as it my bring in some (or a lot of) unrelated changes ?
It will bring in unrelated changes, but after bringing in those changes, it will be able to compile.
It's not nearly as straightforward to disambiguate "ahead because of new commits from developer" vs "ahead because based on a new IB". Given the intended uses of cms-checkout-topic, it doesn't seem as important to me.
Given the intended uses of cms-checkout-topic, it doesn't seem as important to me.
I'm sure you know better what is useful for most other users.
Personally I don't mind, since I don't see any practical use for cms-checkout-topic
(I'd rather checkout some topic in a local branch without changing my working area, and not leave cms-sw/refs/pull/#####/head
and pull/#####_backup
around).
If a lot of people start using cms-checkout-topic for some off-label purpose and encounter problems, then we can consider motivated changes to it. So far, I haven't observed that.
I almost never use any cms-...-topic tool with a PR number. The intended purpose of cms-checkout-topic is to remake a working area (e.g. if the developer accidentally deletes it, or changes computers, or sparse checkout has an issue, etc.). Having addpkg based on the merge-base of the branch and release is a useful feature.
I do think it would be nice to have some tool that automatically finds out the "official" base of a branch, but it's a circular problem - you need a local .git area initialized to know the tags/labels of the commits.
Requested by @makortel. Tested w/
CMSSW_10_0_X_2017-11-14-2300
andgit cms-checkout-topic 20879
, in this case, it prints:If instead using
CMSSW_10_0_X_2017-11-14-1100
, no message is printed (as expected).The message is printed after checkdeps, so the user doesn't miss the message in case checkdeps has a long list.