Open schneiml opened 5 years ago
A new Issue was created by @schneiml Marcel Schneider.
@davidlange6, @Dr15Jones, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks.
cms-bot commands are listed here
assign core
New categories assigned: core
@Dr15Jones,@smuzaffar you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks
@schneiml the use of _
in a module label only needs to be enforced with EDProducers as extra _
mess up the branch names for the data products. We could make the restriction more wide-spread.
Well, we converted all of the DQMEAnalyzers to EDProducer base classes quite a while ago. That might explain where all of these cases come from, though EDM clearly did not complain as long as the EDProducers did not produce anything (-persistent?).
Dear all,
CMSSW bans certain characters from module labels, specifically including
_
. However, it seems to be not very strict about that: having_
in module labels is a fairly common thing [1].Now, that turns into a problem once one tries to produce products in these modules: now EDM complains:
Now, I wonder how to proceed with this. I can do a bunch of batch-replacing to get rind of these labels, but I wonder if EDM should consider enforcing this rule in general at some point?
[1] https://cmssdt.cern.ch/dxr/CMSSW/search?q=regexp%3A%27%5Cw%2B_%5Cw%2B+*%3D+*DQMEDAnalyzer%27&case=false