http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CL_0000134
This class has multiple issues.
1. It seems to confuse mesenchymal cell with 'mesenchymal stem cell'. As far
as I understand it, mesenchyme is simply a description of the non-polarised
cells that make up mesenchyme: a loosely packed developing tissue with
extensive extracellular matrix containing unpolarised cells. As many cells
under CL_0000134 are stem cells, we should probably make a new term for
mesenchymal cell. I'm not sure whether the stem cell is even a subclass of
this general class.
2. The use of cell surface markers in the definition severely limits species
applicability. This looks to me like a case where the cell surface marker
axioms should be punted off into a species specific class - or perhaps into
3. Are we really sure about all those developmental potentials? Can't a
mesenchymal stem cell have only some of these?
4. Is this equivalent class expression ever likely to be useful for
auto-classification?
5. Some notes on the text definition:
"A connective tissue cell that..."
should be part of some connective tissue?
"They may further differentiate into osteoblasts, adipocytes, myocytes,
neurons, or chondroblasts in vitro..."
in vitro? is this in scope?
Original issue reported on code.google.com by dosu...@gmail.com on 14 Jul 2014 at 4:27
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dosu...@gmail.com
on 14 Jul 2014 at 4:27