search

cmungall / cell-ontology-DO-NOT-USE

Initial attempt to move repo from gcode. USE OBOPHENOTYPE
0 stars 0 forks source link

same label with two IRIs #84

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
cytotoxic T cell: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CL_0000910
cytotoxic T cell: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CL_0000491 
regulatory T cell: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CL_0000493
regulatory T cell: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CL_0000815 

One IRI refers to obsolete term. Would be better to rename the deprecated terms

Original issue reported on code.google.com by zhengj2...@gmail.com on 12 Jul 2013 at 5:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Note that relabeled obsolete classes is purely a convention to make up for 
limitations in Protege (it gets confused if there are multiple classes with the 
same label). The GO has many obsolete classes that share the label of a 
non-obsolete class (but it is never the case that two non-obsolete classes will 
share a label). Oort enforces this.

Having said that, we are now using Protege as the primary editing environment 
for CL so we should probably do a mass relabeling of obsolete terms (sigh).

Original comment by cmung...@gmail.com on 30 Jul 2013 at 8:21

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Chris- is this something I could help do manually?

Original comment by vasil...@ohsu.edu on 2 Dec 2014 at 7:15

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Can you prefix label for the obsolete IRI above with "obsolete "

Original comment by cmung...@gmail.com on 2 Dec 2014 at 7:43