search

cmungall / obo-foundry-operations-committee

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/obo-foundry-operations-committee
0 stars 0 forks source link

Ways to have d-acts shown as an ontology of relevance #119

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
A while a go I created an ontology of document acts (d-acts), which is relevant 
to biomedicine, for example regarding consent. D-acts was created as a subset 
of IAO and  has the PURL http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/iao/d-acts

The fact that it is a subset leads to the situation that d-acts is not 
displayed on the OBO Foundry page at all. I got in touch touch with the IAO 
community (namely Melanie) and the plan is not to display subsets/variants 
(which of course makes perfect sense given the number of subsets and variants). 
However, Melanie also agreed with me that -dacts is a different beast from the 
typical subset/variant. It is more like an extension.
However that may be I feel it is in the interest of all involved to have d-acts 
displayed and to allow users of the Foundry to learn that this ontology exists.
How can we address that issue? Is there anyway to take care of that?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by MBrochhausen@gmail.com on 22 Oct 2013 at 1:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Assigning to Chris as he may know what is possible wrt display on the OBO 
Foundry table

Original comment by mcour...@gmail.com on 22 Oct 2013 at 11:09

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
See also issue 
https://code.google.com/p/obo-foundry-operations-committee/issues/detail?id=150 
for request to have a general mechanism

Original comment by mcour...@gmail.com on 8 Aug 2014 at 9:34