Closed mfrey closed 6 years ago
I'm happy to add a better explanation for the STALE/STATIC constants. Also, can we remove the generic comment in the ccnl_content_s
struct
// NON-CONFORM: "The [ContentSTore] MUST also implement the Staleness Bit."
// >> CCNL: currently no stale bit, old content is fully removed <<
Contribution description
This is a "boy scout" pull request. It aims in improving the overall quality of our API documentation. It moved pre-processor statements out of the struct declaration of
ccnl_content_s
to a fixed-width enum and added documentation to the struct and the two functions declared in the header.