Closed radu-matei closed 4 years ago
This PR is opened against the 1.0.1 branch - is this the right approach? How should master be updated?
Perhaps we either cherry-pick from the 1.0.1 branch... or start via a PR against master and then cherry-pick into the 1.0.1 branch (reverse)?
+1 for this being treated as a patch since this wasn't implementable
@vdice are you okay with me merging this onto master
?
@technosophos 👍
The 100 section apparently still had two references to a signed bundle being
bundle.cnab
.This PR just removes those two references, but I suspect we could also add a note in the History section describing the changes.
The main question is whether this can be considered an errata change (see #351).
This PR is opened against the 1.0.1 branch - is this the right approach? How should
master
be updated?cc @chris-crone @technosophos