search

cncf / cluster

🖥🖥🖥🖥CNCF Community Cluster
https://cncf.io/cluster
155 stars 42 forks source link

Usage Followup #34

Closed ronaldpetty closed 7 years ago

ronaldpetty commented 7 years ago

Hello,

I am just curious. What is the CNCF doing to make sure there is tangible benefit(s) from use of the cluster? I see an approval process, but not really a follow up in what was improved about the software involved. Not trying to call any project out, just trying to close the loop so others can reference this as good use and an overall benefit.

I think maybe just linking back to an issue in the various projects would be a good start. (ex. software X has never ran on 500+ machines, it be good to see it work). I also realize it might not lead to some change, but should at least show a decision was made based on its usage. I can appreciate how much time(aka money) and effort goes into running clusters.

If I missed something, I apologize.

Ron

dankohn commented 7 years ago

We ask every cluster user to write a blog post about their experiences with the cluster, good or bad. Best one so far is https://www.cncf.io/blog/2016/08/23/deploying-1000-nodes-of-openshift-on-the-cncf-cluster-part-1

ronaldpetty commented 7 years ago

Thanks @dankohn, thats cool. Maybe worth adding a mention of that to the expectations (README.md)? Happy to do trivial PR, if interested.

dankohn commented 7 years ago

It's mentioned here: https://github.com/cncf/cluster/blob/master/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md#do-you-commit-to-publishing-your-results-and-upstreaming-the-open-source-code-resulting-from-your-work-do-you-agree-to-do-this-within-2-months-of-cluster-use

ronaldpetty commented 7 years ago

Sorry, I see it now, thanks.