[New term] `Sidecar container`

sftim commented 4 months ago

1. Please describe why this term needs to be added

What this term is about? (briefly)

a kind of container that supports a primary app container
Why this term needs to be added? (briefly)
regardless of how you orchestrate containers, the sidecar pattern is widely known and used

We shouldn't plagiarize https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/sidecar, but we can take inspiration from the way that Microsoft explain this topic.

2. Checklist

[X] The suggested term fits the cloud native definition or is essential to understanding cloud native terms. (We hope to avoid adding general or broad terminologies)
[X] There is no existing issue yet. (shift+click to check existing issues)
[X] The term has not already been declined in the past. (shift+click to check)
[X] The term does not already exist in the glossary as a completed term, nor does it exist in this directory as an incomplete term. (If the status of the term is Feedback Appreciated, consider updating the term.)
[X] I understand that maintainers will assess if the term should be part of the Glossary. (Please be patient)
[ ] I want to work on this term and confirm that I meet the criteria as outlined in "who can contribute". (If not checked, maintainers will assign another volunteer)

(Note)

Maintainers will assign a label after assessment procedure. (from triage/awaiting to triage/accepted or triage/not accepted)

A contributor can be assigned to this issue after the issue get the triage/accepted label. The assignee needs to check Style Guide.

seokho-son commented 3 months ago

Let me tag this issue as help wanted. This issue is not assigned to any contributor yet. Feel free to take on.

fharris commented 1 month ago

Hello, can I take this one? @seokho-son @sftim

sftim commented 1 month ago

This is open source, help is welcome!

fharris commented 1 month ago

Thank you @sftim ! Should I be assigned first to the issue by one of you?

fharris commented 1 month ago

Hello @sftim and @Okabe-Junya . https://github.com/cncf/glossary/pull/3173 to solve this. Appreciate your review . Cheers

Okabe-Junya commented 1 month ago

Great work!!

Please note that Tim and I are not maintainers (reviewers) of this repository. Since your PR requests a review from maintainers, could you please wait a bit? Thank you!!

(Tim will probably review or comment, but that is up to Tim.)

fharris commented 1 month ago

Thank you @Okabe-Junya . Sure I can wait. No rush. Thank you all for your patience and support.

cncf / glossary