Closed chalin closed 3 years ago
Ah, I just noticed the links that @nate-double-u added to https://github.com/cncf/hugo-netlify-starter/issues/58#issuecomment-866259850, referring to the licenses for our techdocs repo and the cncf/project-template:
Some more relevant PRs: cncf/techdocs#19, cncf/project-template#12
@celestehorgan's comments in those PRs confirm the statement made in the opening comment here. Hmm, I think that licensing was discussed while I was away.
I'd like to vote for keeping things extra simple by having a single license file per repo mentioning the entire licensing policy, as proposed in #63.
Hmm, I think that licensing was discussed while I was away.
We did, I think this is the relevant slack thread: https://cloud-native.slack.com/archives/G01CSL044G0/p1624384834007600
CNCF websites (and hence this website template repo), should have the following licensing terms AFAIK:
If you agree, I'd like to suggest that this template repo have a single LICENSE file containing the following text:
This is the LICENSE we're using for etcd.io.
Since 9ce9f2d835f216db463c4872b9ddf984eb4ad42f, this template repo's LICENSE only mentions (2).
cc @caniszczyk @celestehorgan @nate-double-u
Related: #62