[Sandbox] krkn

[psuriset]

Application contact emails

nelluri@redhat.com , briordan@redhat.com, psuriset@redhat.com

Project Summary

Krkn is a chaos and resiliency testing tool for Kubernetes with a focus on evaluating performance under load and scale

Project Description

Krkn is a chaos and resiliency testing tool for Kubernetes with a focus on evaluating performance under load and scale. It injects deliberate failures into the clusters to check if it is resilient to turbulent conditions and cluster as well as the components under test undergo minimal performance degradation to meet the SLOs and SLAs. In addition to performance and resiliency evaluation, health of the entire cluster is also checked as disruption of one component might have an impact on other components. Methodology is captured as part of the Chaos Testing Guide: https://redhat-chaos.github.io/krkn/.

Org repo URL

https://github.com/redhat-chaos

Project repo URL

All repos under in this org (https://github.com/redhat-chaos):

Primary project is krkn (https://github.com/redhat-chaos/krkn) & rest of them belong to krkn ecosystem.

Additional repos

Website URL

https://github.com/redhat-chaos/krkn and https://redhat-chaos.github.io/krkn/

Roadmap

https://github.com/redhat-chaos/krkn/blob/main/ROADMAP.md

Roadmap context

The roadmap items are prioritized based on the requests and feedback from the community. Each of the items added to the roadmap are thoroughly evaluated, discussed before adding the support in the tool.

Contributing Guide

https://github.com/redhat-chaos/krkn/blob/main/docs/contribute.md

Code of Conduct (CoC)

https://github.com/redhat-chaos/krkn/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Adopters

STARTX: French consulting and training company delivering expertise to build private and public cloud using Open-Source solutions. Red Hat: Engineering teams use it to chaos test Kubernetes, OpenShift and services running on top of it in CI environments like Prow. IBM Research: Engineering teams use it to develop chaos pipelines in software products - AI Framework integration to expand the capabilities after opening enhancements in Krkn and reviewed by maintainer and contributor Krkn team.

Contributing or Sponsoring Org

Red Hat Inc.

Maintainers file

https://github.com/redhat-chaos/krkn/blob/main/MAINTAINERS.md

IP Policy

• [X] If the project is accepted, I agree the project will follow the CNCF IP Policy

Trademark and accounts

• [X] If the project is accepted, I agree to donate all project trademarks and accounts to the CNCF

Why CNCF?

Our team firmly believes that Krkn is a valuable addition to the CNCF's impressive range of projects and could greatly benefit from support, oversight and direction that CNCF provides. The Krkn community would benefit from CNCF donation by allowing additional contributions and maintainers from the broader CNCF community. Krkn also provides features and capabilities that are not covered by other CNCF projects so the greater CNCF community would find Krkn’s adoption valuable as well. In addition, Krkn being part of CNCF will help adopt good principles of governance and get guidance to build it into an incubation level project moving forward.

Benefit to the Landscape

We would like to share the tooling and methodology of evaluating performance under chaotic conditions with the community involved in improving the performance, resilience and reliability of Kubernetes and services running on top of Kubernetes. As part of this, also maintain a chaos testing guide to help users get started: https://redhat-chaos.github.io/krkn/.

This will help the ecosystem and community in cross-pollinating the areas of resilience/chaos and performance for Kubernetes.

Cloud Native 'Fit'

No response

Cloud Native 'Integration'

No response

Cloud Native Overlap

Krkn share similar interests interms of chaos engineering with Litmus and Chaos-mesh but differs in terms of methodology especially considering performance as the main factor in addition to resilience.

Krkn provides the following capabilities that are not covered by Litmus or Chaos-mesh:

1. Designed keeping performance evaluation under chaotic conditions as the focus in addition to fault injection and recovery checks to make sure the component under test has minimal impact on the SLOs and SLAs.
2. Validates health of the entire cluster for pass/fail of a scenario as impact on one of the components can potentially disrupt other components.
3. Active work to support scenarios to run in parallel under load to mimic real world outages where multiple things can go wrong at once.
4. Runs outside the cluster to make sure it doesn’t become a victim of its own chaos running inside the cluster and reports the right results.

Similar projects

https://github.com/litmuschaos/litmus https://github.com/chaos-mesh/chaos-mesh

Product or Service to Project separation

Krkn is an 100% open source project with a focus on community and not a product. Currently it’s under redhat-chaos github organization but will be a separate repository if accepted for CNCF sandboxing.

Project presentations

Blog post on introduction to Kraken: https://www.openshift.com/blog/introduction-to-kraken-a-chaos-tool-for-openshift/kubernetes Discussion and demo on how Kraken can be leveraged to ensure Kubernetes/OpenShift is reliable, performant and scalable: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1PvupI5sD0&ab_channel=OpenShift Blog post emphasizing the importance of making Chaos part of Performance and Scale runs to mimic the production environments: https://www.openshift.com/blog/making-chaos-part-of-kubernetes/openshift-performance-and-scalability-tests Blog post on findings from Chaos test runs: https://cloud.redhat.com/blog/openshift/kubernetes-chaos-stories

Project champions

No response

Additional information

No response

[joshgav]

@prithvi1307 @umamukkara @ksatchit as leads of https://github.com/cncf/chaosengineering-wg it would be great to get your thoughts here.

Let's try to include the krkn contributors in the work you're pursuing on chaos/resiliency testing generally. Thanks!

[AloisReitbauer]

Hello,

could you present the project in an upcoming TAG App Delivery meeting.

[amye]

Additional note: the TOC would like more clarity on which repos are in scope for this project. Thanks!

[psuriset]

@AloisReitbauer Absolutely we will add the demo to the agenda for next month's TAG App Delivery meeting. Thanks.

[psuriset]

@amye https://github.com/redhat-chaos/krkn is the primary repository in scope.

There are other repos in redhat-chaos which are add-ons which can be integrated in krkn if needed:

[jberkus]

@psuriset none of the other repos?

[joshgav]

I'm excited to hear from krkn and @psuriset in TAG App Delivery and I believe testing and verification is indeed a part of application delivery. For example, LitmusChaos is managed by our TAG and there was even some effort to start a Chaos Engg WG with us.

But some testing frameworks like ChaosBlade and ChaosMesh are managed by TAG Security. Let's be sure we're aligned on where test and verification frameworks fit in our landscape.

@psuriset let's get you on the TAG schedule, I think there's still some time at our next general meeting on Wednesday 9/20. Here's the agenda/notes doc, add yourself and I'll let the other leads know: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OykvqvhSG4AxEdmDMXilrupsX2n1qCSJUWwTc3I7AOs/edit

Thanks!

[psuriset]

@jberkus Other repos are not in scope except the ones listed in this comment. https://github.com/cncf/sandbox/issues/44#issuecomment-1716007652

[amye]

The TOC was unclear about which repos were being contributed. Recommend that you re-organize your project repositories and more clearly indicate what's here, as well as editing your application so that it is clear.

[psuriset]

@amye Apologies for the confusion. We re-organized our project repos in our github org. Everything under this org belongs to krkn ecosystem which we would like to move to cncf. We will give admin access to this org once application is approved. We can also rename it to be more community centric. https://github.com/redhat-chaos

Updated the application as well. (cc: @jberkus )

[joshgav]

Thank you @psuriset and team for presenting krkn to TAG App Delivery. Our writeup along with links to the recording and slides from the presentation are at https://github.com/cncf/tag-app-delivery/issues/465#issuecomment-1776075439.

The TAG believes krkn is a good fit for CNCF sandbox.

[amye]

/vote-sandbox

[git-vote[bot]]

Vote created

@amye has called for a vote on [Sandbox] krkn (#44).

The members of the following teams have binding votes:	Team
@cncf/cncf-toc

Non-binding votes are also appreciated as a sign of support!

How to vote

You can cast your vote by reacting to this comment. The following reactions are supported:

In favor	Against	Abstain
👍	👎	👀

Please note that voting for multiple options is not allowed and those votes won't be counted.

The vote will be open for 7days. It will pass if at least 66% of the users with binding votes vote In favor 👍. Once it's closed, results will be published here as a new comment.

[TheFoxAtWork]

@psuriset Please reach out to TAG Security to ensure they are aware of this project. Several other Chaos testing tools are aligned under TAG Security.

@joshgav would TAG App Delivery coordinate with TAG Security to clarify where chaos projects are homed?

[chaitanyaenr]

/check-vote

[git-vote[bot]]

Vote status

So far 9.09% of the users with binding vote are in favor (passing threshold: 66%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
1	0	0	10

Binding votes (1)

User	Vote	Timestamp
TheFoxAtWork	In favor	2023-12-12 18:35:46.0 +00:00:00
@rochaporto	Pending
@mattfarina	Pending
@justincormack	Pending
@RichiH	Pending
@mauilion	Pending
@dzolotusky	Pending
@cathyhongzhang	Pending
@nikhita	Pending
@kgamanji	Pending
@erinaboyd	Pending

Non-binding votes (20)

| User | Vote | Timestamp | | ---- | :---: | :-------: | | chaitanyaenr | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:08:19.0 +00:00:00 | | paigerube14 | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:08:28.0 +00:00:00 | | josecastillolema | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:11:29.0 +00:00:00 | | shahsahil264 | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:18:58.0 +00:00:00 | | psuriset | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:27:29.0 +00:00:00 | | rpattath | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:37:49.0 +00:00:00 | | vishnuchalla | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:56:28.0 +00:00:00 | | mukrishn | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:09:10.0 +00:00:00 | | afcollins | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:46:32.0 +00:00:00 | | charishma1 | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:56:21.0 +00:00:00 | | mohit-sheth | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:02:28.0 +00:00:00 | | bose-abhishek | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:12:34.0 +00:00:00 | | igsilya | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:15:59.0 +00:00:00 | | qiliRedHat | In favor | 2023-12-13 1:22:26.0 +00:00:00 | | smalleni | In favor | 2023-12-13 2:00:36.0 +00:00:00 | | yogananth-subramanian | In favor | 2023-12-13 2:30:06.0 +00:00:00 | | mudverma | In favor | 2023-12-13 4:52:56.0 +00:00:00 | | chentex | In favor | 2023-12-13 8:10:17.0 +00:00:00 | | tsebastiani | In favor | 2023-12-13 8:35:21.0 +00:00:00 | | rsevilla87 | In favor | 2023-12-13 11:58:59.0 +00:00:00 |

[git-vote[bot]]

Votes can only be checked once a day.

[chaitanyaenr]

@psuriset Please reach out to TAG Security to ensure they are aware of this project. Several other Chaos testing tools are aligned under TAG Security.

@joshgav would TAG App Delivery coordinate with TAG Security to clarify where chaos projects are homed?

@TheFoxAtWork Sure thing, we will work with @joshgav to share Krkn project details with the TAG Security. Thanks!

[chaitanyaenr]

/check-vote

[git-vote[bot]]

Votes can only be checked once a day.

[tsebastiani]

/check-vote

[git-vote[bot]]

Vote status

So far 27.27% of the users with binding vote are in favor (passing threshold: 66%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
3	0	0	8

Binding votes (3)

User	Vote	Timestamp
cathyhongzhang	In favor	2023-12-13 19:02:55.0 +00:00:00
TheFoxAtWork	In favor	2023-12-12 18:35:46.0 +00:00:00
justincormack	In favor	2023-12-13 15:54:07.0 +00:00:00
@rochaporto	Pending
@mattfarina	Pending
@RichiH	Pending
@mauilion	Pending
@dzolotusky	Pending
@nikhita	Pending
@kgamanji	Pending
@erinaboyd	Pending

Non-binding votes (20)

| User | Vote | Timestamp | | ---- | :---: | :-------: | | chaitanyaenr | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:08:19.0 +00:00:00 | | paigerube14 | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:08:28.0 +00:00:00 | | josecastillolema | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:11:29.0 +00:00:00 | | shahsahil264 | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:18:58.0 +00:00:00 | | psuriset | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:27:29.0 +00:00:00 | | rpattath | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:37:49.0 +00:00:00 | | vishnuchalla | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:56:28.0 +00:00:00 | | mukrishn | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:09:10.0 +00:00:00 | | afcollins | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:46:32.0 +00:00:00 | | charishma1 | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:56:21.0 +00:00:00 | | mohit-sheth | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:02:28.0 +00:00:00 | | bose-abhishek | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:12:34.0 +00:00:00 | | igsilya | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:15:59.0 +00:00:00 | | qiliRedHat | In favor | 2023-12-13 1:22:26.0 +00:00:00 | | smalleni | In favor | 2023-12-13 2:00:36.0 +00:00:00 | | yogananth-subramanian | In favor | 2023-12-13 2:30:06.0 +00:00:00 | | mudverma | In favor | 2023-12-13 4:52:56.0 +00:00:00 | | chentex | In favor | 2023-12-13 8:10:17.0 +00:00:00 | | tsebastiani | In favor | 2023-12-13 8:35:21.0 +00:00:00 | | rsevilla87 | In favor | 2023-12-13 11:58:59.0 +00:00:00 |

[tsebastiani]

/check-vote

[git-vote[bot]]

Votes can only be checked once a day.

[shahsahil264]

/check-vote

[git-vote[bot]]

Votes can only be checked once a day.

[tsebastiani]

/check-vote

[git-vote[bot]]

Votes can only be checked once a day.

[tsebastiani]

/check-vote

[git-vote[bot]]

Vote status

So far 36.36% of the users with binding vote are in favor (passing threshold: 66%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
4	0	0	7

Binding votes (4)

User	Vote	Timestamp
justincormack	In favor	2023-12-13 15:54:07.0 +00:00:00
cathyhongzhang	In favor	2023-12-13 19:02:55.0 +00:00:00
dzolotusky	In favor	2023-12-15 14:59:12.0 +00:00:00
TheFoxAtWork	In favor	2023-12-12 18:35:46.0 +00:00:00
@rochaporto	Pending
@mattfarina	Pending
@RichiH	Pending
@mauilion	Pending
@nikhita	Pending
@kgamanji	Pending
@erinaboyd	Pending

Non-binding votes (20)

| User | Vote | Timestamp | | ---- | :---: | :-------: | | chaitanyaenr | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:08:19.0 +00:00:00 | | paigerube14 | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:08:28.0 +00:00:00 | | josecastillolema | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:11:29.0 +00:00:00 | | shahsahil264 | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:18:58.0 +00:00:00 | | psuriset | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:27:29.0 +00:00:00 | | rpattath | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:37:49.0 +00:00:00 | | vishnuchalla | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:56:28.0 +00:00:00 | | mukrishn | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:09:10.0 +00:00:00 | | afcollins | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:46:32.0 +00:00:00 | | charishma1 | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:56:21.0 +00:00:00 | | mohit-sheth | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:02:28.0 +00:00:00 | | bose-abhishek | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:12:34.0 +00:00:00 | | igsilya | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:15:59.0 +00:00:00 | | qiliRedHat | In favor | 2023-12-13 1:22:26.0 +00:00:00 | | smalleni | In favor | 2023-12-13 2:00:36.0 +00:00:00 | | yogananth-subramanian | In favor | 2023-12-13 2:30:06.0 +00:00:00 | | mudverma | In favor | 2023-12-13 4:52:56.0 +00:00:00 | | chentex | In favor | 2023-12-13 8:10:17.0 +00:00:00 | | tsebastiani | In favor | 2023-12-13 8:35:21.0 +00:00:00 | | rsevilla87 | In favor | 2023-12-13 11:58:59.0 +00:00:00 |

[psuriset]

/check-vote

[git-vote[bot]]

Vote status

So far 36.36% of the users with binding vote are in favor (passing threshold: 66%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
4	0	0	7

Binding votes (4)

User	Vote	Timestamp
cathyhongzhang	In favor	2023-12-13 19:02:55.0 +00:00:00
TheFoxAtWork	In favor	2023-12-12 18:35:46.0 +00:00:00
justincormack	In favor	2023-12-13 15:54:07.0 +00:00:00
dzolotusky	In favor	2023-12-15 14:59:12.0 +00:00:00
@rochaporto	Pending
@mattfarina	Pending
@RichiH	Pending
@mauilion	Pending
@nikhita	Pending
@kgamanji	Pending
@erinaboyd	Pending

Non-binding votes (20)

| User | Vote | Timestamp | | ---- | :---: | :-------: | | chaitanyaenr | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:08:19.0 +00:00:00 | | paigerube14 | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:08:28.0 +00:00:00 | | josecastillolema | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:11:29.0 +00:00:00 | | shahsahil264 | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:18:58.0 +00:00:00 | | rpattath | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:37:49.0 +00:00:00 | | vishnuchalla | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:56:28.0 +00:00:00 | | mukrishn | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:09:10.0 +00:00:00 | | afcollins | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:46:32.0 +00:00:00 | | charishma1 | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:56:21.0 +00:00:00 | | mohit-sheth | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:02:28.0 +00:00:00 | | bose-abhishek | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:12:34.0 +00:00:00 | | igsilya | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:15:59.0 +00:00:00 | | qiliRedHat | In favor | 2023-12-13 1:22:26.0 +00:00:00 | | smalleni | In favor | 2023-12-13 2:00:36.0 +00:00:00 | | yogananth-subramanian | In favor | 2023-12-13 2:30:06.0 +00:00:00 | | mudverma | In favor | 2023-12-13 4:52:56.0 +00:00:00 | | chentex | In favor | 2023-12-13 8:10:17.0 +00:00:00 | | tsebastiani | In favor | 2023-12-13 8:35:21.0 +00:00:00 | | rsevilla87 | In favor | 2023-12-13 11:58:59.0 +00:00:00 | | psuriset | In favor | 2023-12-16 21:17:12.0 +00:00:00 |

[tsebastiani]

/check-vote

[git-vote[bot]]

Votes can only be checked once a day.

[psuriset]

/check-vote

[git-vote[bot]]

Vote status

So far 54.55% of the users with binding vote are in favor (passing threshold: 66%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
6	0	0	5

Binding votes (6)

User	Vote	Timestamp
kgamanji	In favor	2023-12-17 13:14:40.0 +00:00:00
rochaporto	In favor	2023-12-17 22:13:54.0 +00:00:00
TheFoxAtWork	In favor	2023-12-12 18:35:46.0 +00:00:00
cathyhongzhang	In favor	2023-12-13 19:02:55.0 +00:00:00
dzolotusky	In favor	2023-12-15 14:59:12.0 +00:00:00
justincormack	In favor	2023-12-13 15:54:07.0 +00:00:00
@mattfarina	Pending
@RichiH	Pending
@mauilion	Pending
@nikhita	Pending
@erinaboyd	Pending

Non-binding votes (21)

| User | Vote | Timestamp | | ---- | :---: | :-------: | | chaitanyaenr | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:08:19.0 +00:00:00 | | paigerube14 | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:08:28.0 +00:00:00 | | josecastillolema | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:11:29.0 +00:00:00 | | shahsahil264 | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:18:58.0 +00:00:00 | | rpattath | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:37:49.0 +00:00:00 | | vishnuchalla | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:56:28.0 +00:00:00 | | mukrishn | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:09:10.0 +00:00:00 | | afcollins | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:46:32.0 +00:00:00 | | charishma1 | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:56:21.0 +00:00:00 | | mohit-sheth | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:02:28.0 +00:00:00 | | bose-abhishek | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:12:34.0 +00:00:00 | | igsilya | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:15:59.0 +00:00:00 | | qiliRedHat | In favor | 2023-12-13 1:22:26.0 +00:00:00 | | smalleni | In favor | 2023-12-13 2:00:36.0 +00:00:00 | | yogananth-subramanian | In favor | 2023-12-13 2:30:06.0 +00:00:00 | | mudverma | In favor | 2023-12-13 4:52:56.0 +00:00:00 | | chentex | In favor | 2023-12-13 8:10:17.0 +00:00:00 | | tsebastiani | In favor | 2023-12-13 8:35:21.0 +00:00:00 | | rsevilla87 | In favor | 2023-12-13 11:58:59.0 +00:00:00 | | Harshith-umesh | In favor | 2023-12-16 21:34:19.0 +00:00:00 | | psuriset | In favor | 2023-12-17 1:27:37.0 +00:00:00 |

[tsebastiani]

/check-vote

[git-vote[bot]]

Votes can only be checked once a day.

[shahsahil264]

/check-vote

[git-vote[bot]]

Votes can only be checked once a day.

[smalleni]

/check-vote

[git-vote[bot]]

Vote status

So far 63.64% of the users with binding vote are in favor (passing threshold: 66%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
7	0	0	4

Binding votes (7)

User	Vote	Timestamp
cathyhongzhang	In favor	2023-12-13 19:02:55.0 +00:00:00
justincormack	In favor	2023-12-13 15:54:07.0 +00:00:00
TheFoxAtWork	In favor	2023-12-12 18:35:46.0 +00:00:00
rochaporto	In favor	2023-12-17 22:13:54.0 +00:00:00
dzolotusky	In favor	2023-12-15 14:59:12.0 +00:00:00
mattfarina	In favor	2023-12-18 13:58:22.0 +00:00:00
kgamanji	In favor	2023-12-17 13:14:40.0 +00:00:00
@RichiH	Pending
@mauilion	Pending
@nikhita	Pending
@erinaboyd	Pending

Non-binding votes (22)

| User | Vote | Timestamp | | ---- | :---: | :-------: | | chaitanyaenr | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:08:19.0 +00:00:00 | | paigerube14 | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:08:28.0 +00:00:00 | | josecastillolema | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:11:29.0 +00:00:00 | | shahsahil264 | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:18:58.0 +00:00:00 | | rpattath | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:37:49.0 +00:00:00 | | vishnuchalla | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:56:28.0 +00:00:00 | | mukrishn | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:09:10.0 +00:00:00 | | afcollins | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:46:32.0 +00:00:00 | | charishma1 | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:56:21.0 +00:00:00 | | mohit-sheth | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:02:28.0 +00:00:00 | | bose-abhishek | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:12:34.0 +00:00:00 | | igsilya | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:15:59.0 +00:00:00 | | qiliRedHat | In favor | 2023-12-13 1:22:26.0 +00:00:00 | | smalleni | In favor | 2023-12-13 2:00:36.0 +00:00:00 | | yogananth-subramanian | In favor | 2023-12-13 2:30:06.0 +00:00:00 | | mudverma | In favor | 2023-12-13 4:52:56.0 +00:00:00 | | chentex | In favor | 2023-12-13 8:10:17.0 +00:00:00 | | tsebastiani | In favor | 2023-12-13 8:35:21.0 +00:00:00 | | rsevilla87 | In favor | 2023-12-13 11:58:59.0 +00:00:00 | | Harshith-umesh | In favor | 2023-12-16 21:34:19.0 +00:00:00 | | psuriset | In favor | 2023-12-17 1:27:37.0 +00:00:00 | | kami619 | In favor | 2023-12-18 10:31:11.0 +00:00:00 |

[joshgav]

Please note @mauilion's vote was made in https://github.com/cncf/sandbox/issues/44#issuecomment-1858165359 instead of https://github.com/cncf/sandbox/issues/44#issuecomment-1852449483 and so is not being counted.

With that vote 8/11 are in favor and this should be accepted to sandbox.

[git-vote[bot]]

Vote closed

The vote passed! 🎉

72.73% of the users with binding vote were in favor (passing threshold: 66%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
8	0	0	3

Binding votes (8)

User	Vote	Timestamp
@cathyhongzhang	In favor	2023-12-13 19:02:55.0 +00:00:00
@TheFoxAtWork	In favor	2023-12-12 18:35:46.0 +00:00:00
@erinaboyd	In favor	2023-12-19 14:04:52.0 +00:00:00
@dzolotusky	In favor	2023-12-15 14:59:12.0 +00:00:00
@justincormack	In favor	2023-12-13 15:54:07.0 +00:00:00
@mattfarina	In favor	2023-12-18 13:58:22.0 +00:00:00
@kgamanji	In favor	2023-12-17 13:14:40.0 +00:00:00
@rochaporto	In favor	2023-12-17 22:13:54.0 +00:00:00

Non-binding votes (23)

| User | Vote | Timestamp | | ---- | :---: | :-------: | | @chaitanyaenr | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:08:19.0 +00:00:00 | | @paigerube14 | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:08:28.0 +00:00:00 | | @josecastillolema | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:11:29.0 +00:00:00 | | @shahsahil264 | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:18:58.0 +00:00:00 | | @rpattath | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:37:49.0 +00:00:00 | | @vishnuchalla | In favor | 2023-12-12 17:56:28.0 +00:00:00 | | @mukrishn | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:09:10.0 +00:00:00 | | @afcollins | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:46:32.0 +00:00:00 | | @charishma1 | In favor | 2023-12-12 18:56:21.0 +00:00:00 | | @mohit-sheth | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:02:28.0 +00:00:00 | | @bose-abhishek | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:12:34.0 +00:00:00 | | @igsilya | In favor | 2023-12-12 19:15:59.0 +00:00:00 | | @qiliRedHat | In favor | 2023-12-13 1:22:26.0 +00:00:00 | | @smalleni | In favor | 2023-12-13 2:00:36.0 +00:00:00 | | @yogananth-subramanian | In favor | 2023-12-13 2:30:06.0 +00:00:00 | | @mudverma | In favor | 2023-12-13 4:52:56.0 +00:00:00 | | @chentex | In favor | 2023-12-13 8:10:17.0 +00:00:00 | | @tsebastiani | In favor | 2023-12-13 8:35:21.0 +00:00:00 | | @rsevilla87 | In favor | 2023-12-13 11:58:59.0 +00:00:00 | | @Harshith-umesh | In favor | 2023-12-16 21:34:19.0 +00:00:00 | | @psuriset | In favor | 2023-12-17 1:27:37.0 +00:00:00 | | @kami619 | In favor | 2023-12-18 10:31:11.0 +00:00:00 | | @joshgav | In favor | 2023-12-19 15:51:04.0 +00:00:00 |

[psuriset]

Thank you accepting our project into CNCF Sandbox program.

[Cmierly]

Hi @psuriset ! Welcome aboard! We're very excited to get you onboarded as a CNCF sandbox project! Here's the link to your onboarding checklist: https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/1228

Here you can communicate any questions or concerns you might have. Please don't hesitate to reach out, I am always happy to help!