Any specific aspects of your governance structure are you seeking feedback on?
We are wondering how our roles and contributor ladder aligns with other projects, and if any areas should be adjusted.
Do you have any concerns or specific areas where you feel your governance could be improved?
We recently lost several maintainers due to inactivity, change of jobs, and other reasons. We would love for our end users to engage, but are wondering if the bar is too high. Any advice on that would be much appreciated.
Project Name
Kyverno
Project Website
https://kyverno.io/
Contact Details 1
@JimBugwadia
Contact Details 2
@realshuting
Links to communication channels
https://slack.k8s.io/#kyverno
Reason for governance review request
Application for moving levels from Incubation to Graduation
Are there any sub-projects, plugins, and related?
Governance model
We were not aware of these, but our model seems very similar to the Maintainer Council Governance template.
https://github.com/kyverno/community/blob/main/GOVERNANCE.md
Governance documents
https://github.com/kyverno/community/blob/main/GOVERNANCE.md#summary-of-roles
https://github.com/kyverno/community/blob/main/GOVERNANCE.md#project-roles
https://github.com/kyverno/community/blob/main/GOVERNANCE.md#code-of-conduct
https://github.com/kyverno/community/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
https://main.kyverno.io/community/#community-meeting
https://github.com/kyverno/community/blob/main/SECURITY.md
The main project and sub-projects have code owners file:
(some are missing, we will add these)
Governance Execution Examples
We have not held any public votes, but typically use the maintainer's meetings and slack channels to make and advertise decisions.
Promoting a contributor / demoting a maintainer
Security response
Meeting recordings
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I_GWsz32gLw8sQyuu_Wv0-WQrtRLjn9FuX2KGNkvUY4/edit
Governance Evolution
No significant changes, but we did move all governance related docs to a central repository:
https://github.com/kyverno/community/tree/main
Any specific aspects of your governance structure are you seeking feedback on?
We are wondering how our roles and contributor ladder aligns with other projects, and if any areas should be adjusted.
Do you have any concerns or specific areas where you feel your governance could be improved?
We recently lost several maintainers due to inactivity, change of jobs, and other reasons. We would love for our end users to engage, but are wondering if the bar is too high. Any advice on that would be much appreciated.
Additional notes and resources
No response