Open nathantypanski opened 10 years ago
This section does not exclude non-CNU-affiliated parties. Is this desirable/necessary (according to OSA)?
We can discuss that with OSA tomorrow before deciding if it's something we have to amend.
My hunch is that, while we define 'active members' in the constitution today, future ratifications will introduce 'trusted members' in addition to this, who have certain special rights and duties to the club.
It would not surprise me were we to require that 'trusted members' be CNU-affiliated, should they oversee responsibilities that affect "CNULUG the university-afiliated club" and not just "CNULUG the band of people who use free and open source operating systems".
Reproducing these here, so we don't have to search in the list posts for his feedback.
Related: #5 #6