search

coala / meta

A repository for non-code activities, such as engagement initiatives, and other meta issues
6 stars 5 forks source link

Create PRs for the linters we support to add 'you can run this with coala' to their docs #50

Open underyx opened 7 years ago

sils commented 7 years ago

CC @srisankethu @sims1253 @jayvdb might be a good GCI repeatable task

jayvdb commented 7 years ago

ya. It would be. The important part is asking them to find the linter documentation about wrappers (including vim plugins / emacs modes) as an anchor for where to add coala.

If the linter doesnt have wrappers mentioned in their documentation, it is not easy to add it, and IMO it shouldnt be added by a high school student - that would be asking them to be a coala spammer.

underyx commented 7 years ago

If us maintainers personally wrote messages about how we're in need of more exposure and how we think coala could be useful for the given linter's users, I'm pretty sure linter maintainers would be more sympathetic and could accept these PRs even if they didn't already have a relevant section.

On Sat, Nov 19, 2016, 1:24 AM John Vandenberg notifications@github.com wrote:

ya. It would be. The important part is asking them to find the linter documentation about wrappers (including vim plugins / emacs modes) as an anchor for where to add coala.

If the linter doesnt have wrappers mentioned in their documentation, it is not easy to add it, and IMO it shouldnt be added by a high school student - that would be asking them to be a coala spammer.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/coala/engagement/issues/50#issuecomment-261676466, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABAuVOYQNXLeUeyKs4w2kJILxjnflrb0ks5q_kHQgaJpZM4Kqv66 .

jayvdb commented 7 years ago

Ya. The GCI participants can do the initial leg work, and then pass the task to a maintainer if it isnt 'easy'.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 07:30 Bence Nagy, notifications@github.com wrote:

If us maintainers personally wrote messages about how we're in need of more exposure and how we think coala could be useful for the given linter's users, I'm pretty sure linter maintainers would be more sympathetic and could accept these PRs even if they didn't already have a relevant section.

On Sat, Nov 19, 2016, 1:24 AM John Vandenberg notifications@github.com wrote:

ya. It would be. The important part is asking them to find the linter documentation about wrappers (including vim plugins / emacs modes) as an anchor for where to add coala.

If the linter doesnt have wrappers mentioned in their documentation, it is not easy to add it, and IMO it shouldnt be added by a high school student - that would be asking them to be a coala spammer.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/coala/engagement/issues/50#issuecomment-261676466, or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABAuVOYQNXLeUeyKs4w2kJILxjnflrb0ks5q_kHQgaJpZM4Kqv66

.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/coala/engagement/issues/50#issuecomment-261677155, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAA69ABqTahJHuuPPCNwx0B0yC-f2hbdks5q_kM2gaJpZM4Kqv66 .