[no-test]: Bump the esbuild group with 2 updates

[dependabot[bot]]

Bumps the esbuild group with 2 updates: esbuild and esbuild-wasm.

Updates esbuild from 0.20.2 to 0.21.1

Release notes

Sourced from esbuild's releases.

v0.21.1

• Fix a regression with --keep-names (#3756)

  The previous release introduced a regression with the --keep-names setting and object literals with get/set accessor methods, in which case the generated code contained syntax errors. This release fixes the regression:

  // Original code
  x = { get y() {} }
  // Output from version 0.21.0 (with --keep-names)
  x = { get y: /* @PURE */ __name(function() {
  }, "y") };
  // Output from this version (with --keep-names)
  x = { get y() {
  } };
  

v0.21.0

This release doesn't contain any deliberately-breaking changes. However, it contains a very complex new feature and while all of esbuild's tests pass, I would not be surprised if an important edge case turns out to be broken. So I'm releasing this as a breaking change release to avoid causing any trouble. As usual, make sure to test your code when you upgrade.

• Implement the JavaScript decorators proposal (#104)

  With this release, esbuild now contains an implementation of the upcoming JavaScript decorators proposal. This is the same feature that shipped in TypeScript 5.0 and has been highly-requested on esbuild's issue tracker. You can read more about them in that blog post and in this other (now slightly outdated) extensive blog post here: https://2ality.com/2022/10/javascript-decorators.html. Here's a quick example:

  const log = (fn, context) => function() {
    console.log(`before ${context.name}`)
    const it = fn.apply(this, arguments)
    console.log(`after ${context.name}`)
    return it
  }
  class Foo {
  @​log static foo() {
  console.log('in foo')
  }
  }
  // Logs "before foo", "in foo", "after foo"
  Foo.foo()
  

  Note that this feature is different than the existing "TypeScript experimental decorators" feature that esbuild already implements. It uses similar syntax but behaves very differently, and the two are not compatible (although it's sometimes possible to write decorators that work with both). TypeScript experimental decorators will still be supported by esbuild going forward as they have been around for a long time, are very widely used, and let you do certain things that are not possible with JavaScript decorators (such as decorating function parameters). By default esbuild will parse and transform JavaScript decorators, but you can tell esbuild to parse and transform TypeScript experimental decorators instead by setting "experimentalDecorators": true in your tsconfig.json file.

  Probably at least half of the work for this feature went into creating a test suite that exercises many of the proposal's edge cases: https://github.com/evanw/decorator-tests. It has given me a reasonable level of confidence that esbuild's initial implementation is acceptable. However, I don't have access to a significant sample of real code that uses JavaScript decorators. If you're currently using JavaScript decorators in a real code base, please try out esbuild's implementation and let me know if anything seems off.

  ⚠️ WARNING ⚠️

  This proposal has been in the works for a very long time (work began around 10 years ago in 2014) and it is finally getting close to becoming part of the JavaScript language. However, it's still a work in progress and isn't a part of JavaScript yet, so keep in mind that any code that uses JavaScript decorators may need to be updated as the feature continues to evolve. The decorators proposal is pretty close to its final form but it can and likely will undergo some small behavioral adjustments before it ends up becoming a part of the standard. If/when that happens, I will update esbuild's implementation to match the specification. I will not be supporting old versions of the specification.

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from esbuild's changelog.

0.21.1

• Fix a regression with --keep-names (#3756)

  The previous release introduced a regression with the --keep-names setting and object literals with get/set accessor methods, in which case the generated code contained syntax errors. This release fixes the regression:

  // Original code
  x = { get y() {} }
  // Output from version 0.21.0 (with --keep-names)
  x = { get y: /* @PURE */ __name(function() {
  }, "y") };
  // Output from this version (with --keep-names)
  x = { get y() {
  } };
  

0.21.0

This release doesn't contain any deliberately-breaking changes. However, it contains a very complex new feature and while all of esbuild's tests pass, I would not be surprised if an important edge case turns out to be broken. So I'm releasing this as a breaking change release to avoid causing any trouble. As usual, make sure to test your code when you upgrade.

• Implement the JavaScript decorators proposal (#104)

  With this release, esbuild now contains an implementation of the upcoming JavaScript decorators proposal. This is the same feature that shipped in TypeScript 5.0 and has been highly-requested on esbuild's issue tracker. You can read more about them in that blog post and in this other (now slightly outdated) extensive blog post here: https://2ality.com/2022/10/javascript-decorators.html. Here's a quick example:

  const log = (fn, context) => function() {
    console.log(`before ${context.name}`)
    const it = fn.apply(this, arguments)
    console.log(`after ${context.name}`)
    return it
  }
  class Foo {
  @​log static foo() {
  console.log('in foo')
  }
  }
  // Logs "before foo", "in foo", "after foo"
  Foo.foo()
  

  Note that this feature is different than the existing "TypeScript experimental decorators" feature that esbuild already implements. It uses similar syntax but behaves very differently, and the two are not compatible (although it's sometimes possible to write decorators that work with both). TypeScript experimental decorators will still be supported by esbuild going forward as they have been around for a long time, are very widely used, and let you do certain things that are not possible with JavaScript decorators (such as decorating function parameters). By default esbuild will parse and transform JavaScript decorators, but you can tell esbuild to parse and transform TypeScript experimental decorators instead by setting "experimentalDecorators": true in your tsconfig.json file.

  Probably at least half of the work for this feature went into creating a test suite that exercises many of the proposal's edge cases: https://github.com/evanw/decorator-tests. It has given me a reasonable level of confidence that esbuild's initial implementation is acceptable. However, I don't have access to a significant sample of real code that uses JavaScript decorators. If you're currently using JavaScript decorators in a real code base, please try out esbuild's implementation and let me know if anything seems off.

  ⚠️ WARNING ⚠️

... (truncated)

Commits

• e876394 publish 0.21.1 to npm
• 4abc387 adjust decorator source map locations
• e7a9256 fix #3756: regression with --keep-names
• 33cbbea run make update-compat-table
• c6da2c3 publish 0.21.0 to npm
• 4bc834c initial implementation of the decorators proposal (#3754)
• 07cdbe0 some small adjustments to runtime library code
• 71b3d9f split off lowerPrivateMethod from lowerMethod
• 0861625 printer: preserve single-line status of block body
• f426153 runtime: make some helper functions more compact
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Updates esbuild-wasm from 0.20.2 to 0.21.1

Release notes

Sourced from esbuild-wasm's releases.

v0.21.1

• Fix a regression with --keep-names (#3756)

  The previous release introduced a regression with the --keep-names setting and object literals with get/set accessor methods, in which case the generated code contained syntax errors. This release fixes the regression:

  // Original code
  x = { get y() {} }
  // Output from version 0.21.0 (with --keep-names)
  x = { get y: /* @PURE */ __name(function() {
  }, "y") };
  // Output from this version (with --keep-names)
  x = { get y() {
  } };
  

v0.21.0

This release doesn't contain any deliberately-breaking changes. However, it contains a very complex new feature and while all of esbuild's tests pass, I would not be surprised if an important edge case turns out to be broken. So I'm releasing this as a breaking change release to avoid causing any trouble. As usual, make sure to test your code when you upgrade.

• Implement the JavaScript decorators proposal (#104)

  With this release, esbuild now contains an implementation of the upcoming JavaScript decorators proposal. This is the same feature that shipped in TypeScript 5.0 and has been highly-requested on esbuild's issue tracker. You can read more about them in that blog post and in this other (now slightly outdated) extensive blog post here: https://2ality.com/2022/10/javascript-decorators.html. Here's a quick example:

  const log = (fn, context) => function() {
    console.log(`before ${context.name}`)
    const it = fn.apply(this, arguments)
    console.log(`after ${context.name}`)
    return it
  }
  class Foo {
  @​log static foo() {
  console.log('in foo')
  }
  }
  // Logs "before foo", "in foo", "after foo"
  Foo.foo()
  

  Note that this feature is different than the existing "TypeScript experimental decorators" feature that esbuild already implements. It uses similar syntax but behaves very differently, and the two are not compatible (although it's sometimes possible to write decorators that work with both). TypeScript experimental decorators will still be supported by esbuild going forward as they have been around for a long time, are very widely used, and let you do certain things that are not possible with JavaScript decorators (such as decorating function parameters). By default esbuild will parse and transform JavaScript decorators, but you can tell esbuild to parse and transform TypeScript experimental decorators instead by setting "experimentalDecorators": true in your tsconfig.json file.

  Probably at least half of the work for this feature went into creating a test suite that exercises many of the proposal's edge cases: https://github.com/evanw/decorator-tests. It has given me a reasonable level of confidence that esbuild's initial implementation is acceptable. However, I don't have access to a significant sample of real code that uses JavaScript decorators. If you're currently using JavaScript decorators in a real code base, please try out esbuild's implementation and let me know if anything seems off.

  ⚠️ WARNING ⚠️

  This proposal has been in the works for a very long time (work began around 10 years ago in 2014) and it is finally getting close to becoming part of the JavaScript language. However, it's still a work in progress and isn't a part of JavaScript yet, so keep in mind that any code that uses JavaScript decorators may need to be updated as the feature continues to evolve. The decorators proposal is pretty close to its final form but it can and likely will undergo some small behavioral adjustments before it ends up becoming a part of the standard. If/when that happens, I will update esbuild's implementation to match the specification. I will not be supporting old versions of the specification.

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from esbuild-wasm's changelog.

0.21.1

• Fix a regression with --keep-names (#3756)

  The previous release introduced a regression with the --keep-names setting and object literals with get/set accessor methods, in which case the generated code contained syntax errors. This release fixes the regression:

  // Original code
  x = { get y() {} }
  // Output from version 0.21.0 (with --keep-names)
  x = { get y: /* @PURE */ __name(function() {
  }, "y") };
  // Output from this version (with --keep-names)
  x = { get y() {
  } };
  

0.21.0

This release doesn't contain any deliberately-breaking changes. However, it contains a very complex new feature and while all of esbuild's tests pass, I would not be surprised if an important edge case turns out to be broken. So I'm releasing this as a breaking change release to avoid causing any trouble. As usual, make sure to test your code when you upgrade.

• Implement the JavaScript decorators proposal (#104)

  With this release, esbuild now contains an implementation of the upcoming JavaScript decorators proposal. This is the same feature that shipped in TypeScript 5.0 and has been highly-requested on esbuild's issue tracker. You can read more about them in that blog post and in this other (now slightly outdated) extensive blog post here: https://2ality.com/2022/10/javascript-decorators.html. Here's a quick example:

  const log = (fn, context) => function() {
    console.log(`before ${context.name}`)
    const it = fn.apply(this, arguments)
    console.log(`after ${context.name}`)
    return it
  }
  class Foo {
  @​log static foo() {
  console.log('in foo')
  }
  }
  // Logs "before foo", "in foo", "after foo"
  Foo.foo()
  

  Note that this feature is different than the existing "TypeScript experimental decorators" feature that esbuild already implements. It uses similar syntax but behaves very differently, and the two are not compatible (although it's sometimes possible to write decorators that work with both). TypeScript experimental decorators will still be supported by esbuild going forward as they have been around for a long time, are very widely used, and let you do certain things that are not possible with JavaScript decorators (such as decorating function parameters). By default esbuild will parse and transform JavaScript decorators, but you can tell esbuild to parse and transform TypeScript experimental decorators instead by setting "experimentalDecorators": true in your tsconfig.json file.

  Probably at least half of the work for this feature went into creating a test suite that exercises many of the proposal's edge cases: https://github.com/evanw/decorator-tests. It has given me a reasonable level of confidence that esbuild's initial implementation is acceptable. However, I don't have access to a significant sample of real code that uses JavaScript decorators. If you're currently using JavaScript decorators in a real code base, please try out esbuild's implementation and let me know if anything seems off.

  ⚠️ WARNING ⚠️

... (truncated)

Commits

• e876394 publish 0.21.1 to npm
• 4abc387 adjust decorator source map locations
• e7a9256 fix #3756: regression with --keep-names
• 33cbbea run make update-compat-table
• c6da2c3 publish 0.21.0 to npm
• 4bc834c initial implementation of the decorators proposal (#3754)
• 07cdbe0 some small adjustments to runtime library code
• 71b3d9f split off lowerPrivateMethod from lowerMethod
• 0861625 printer: preserve single-line status of block body
• f426153 runtime: make some helper functions more compact
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore major version` will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency's major version (unless you unignore this specific dependency's major version or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore minor version` will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency's minor version (unless you unignore this specific dependency's minor version or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore ` will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency (unless you unignore this specific dependency or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot unignore ` will remove all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot unignore ` will remove the ignore condition of the specified dependency and ignore conditions

[martinpitt]

@dependabot ignore esbuild minor version @dependabot ignore esbuild-wasm minor version

Let's sort this out in https://github.com/cockpit-project/starter-kit/pull/863 first, that has a pointer to the upstream issue. This isn't urgent or important at all.

[dependabot[bot]]

This pull request was built based on a group rule. Closing it will not ignore any of these versions in future pull requests.

To ignore these dependencies, configure ignore rules in dependabot.yml

[dependabot[bot]]

OK, I won't notify you about version 0.21.x of esbuild again, unless you unignore it.

[dependabot[bot]]

Looks like this PR is closed. If you re-open it I'll rebase it as long as no-one else has edited it (you can use @dependabot reopen if the branch has been deleted).