Open stevendanna opened 1 month ago
cc @cockroachdb/disaster-recovery
Perhaps we fix this instead by adding these to SHOW LOGICAL REPLICATION JOB
so that we don't bloat the description.
@azhu-crl @msbutler I'm not really sure this is closed. Having the conflict type in the details is good, but:
@stevendanna hrmm, i now feel like we should just store this stuff in the Description
or in a new DetailedDescription
(avoiding db console weirdness) that SHOW LOGICAL REPLICATION JOBS will use.
It feels like too much work to:
The shape of this UX may change further.
Since we've got bigger fish to fry, i now think we should implement something quick and dirty and move on. We can refine this later. thoughts?
I'm 100% OK with throwing the complete (redacted) sql statement somewhere (just like we do for backup/restore/changefeeds/etc) and then working on exactly what is useful to split out over time.
@azhu-crl could you work on a follow up PR to add options to the description and to ensure that the URL is redacted? Then we can return this description in SHOW LOGICAL REPLICATION JOBS.
Independently, I still think it would be a good idea to display the fully qualified names in the target column of SHOW LOGICAL REPLICATION JOBS.
Will do!
Describe the problem
This job was created with a custom UDF, but that isn't reflected in the job's description:
Jira issue: CRDB-41305