Closed otan closed 2 years ago
Figure out how TTL priority configuration should align with SET ADMISSION PRIORITY (i.e. using numbers versus enums)
If we think we might need the flexibility/tuning with QoS for TTL, I am ok deferring this alignment until later.
i'd advocate for calling row-level TTL "preview" / "experimental" for this release. should we?
In docs, we will call it beta support but that shouldn't apply to any exposed settings or code.
Should we file issues for out of scope items like ttl_expiration_expression
?
This is a meta issue for the v1 TTL meta issue.
⛔ = blocked ✔️ = in review ♻️ = in progress
Done
out of scoped
By February 25
Stability items
debug doctor
Product Questions
SET ADMISSION PRIORITY
(i.e. using numbers versus enums)aggmetric
for metrics, child labels are not applied by default... see slack)Epic CRDB-10488
Jira issue: CRDB-12666