@mrfyda and I reached the conclusion that the Codacy Coverage Reporter is using the internal Codacy lingo "commit UUID" when referring to what's known by most developers as the "commit SHA-1 hash".
This is a proposal to change the way we refer to the SHA-1 hash in the CLI output of the Codacy Coverage Reporter.
@mrfyda and I reached the conclusion that the Codacy Coverage Reporter is using the internal Codacy lingo "commit UUID" when referring to what's known by most developers as the "commit SHA-1 hash".
This is a proposal to change the way we refer to the SHA-1 hash in the CLI output of the Codacy Coverage Reporter.