codacy-production[bot]
commented
2 weeks ago Coverage summary from Codacy
See diff coverage on Codacy
| Coverage variation | Diff coverage |
|---|---|
| :white_check_mark: +0.07% (target: -1.00%) | :white_check_mark: ∅ |
Coverage variation details
| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (9642dc1b1b776e271dbd429d86bdd19d59db88ff) | 939 | 642 | 68.37% | | | Head commit (a56d6379f8418caa104c08c62ff82e42d66bd88e) | 938 (-1) | 642 (+0) | 68.44% (**+0.07%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: `Diff coverage details
| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#508) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences
:rocket: Don’t miss a bit, follow what’s new on Codacy.
Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more
Motivation
I initially ported the code from other repositories (codacy-api-scala and coverage-parser) and by default I put them in separate modules. But they can live in the root module so the repository is simpler to manage.