Closed code423n4 closed 2 years ago
While these warnings were triggered likely due to calls to external contracts without a reentrancy guard, we do not believe reentrancy is actually possible in any of these functions due to the fact that the external contracts called have known implementations that would not re-enter.
This is obviously a false positive produced by automated tooling. This is NOT valid, please avoid doing this in the future.
Handle
0v3rf10w
Vulnerability details
Impact
Potential Reentrancy at multiple places
Proof of Concept
Recommended Mitigation Steps
Please use Reentrancy Guard from OZ on all these potential functions that can lead to reentrancy.