Open code423n4 opened 2 years ago
In the following code, the second block.timestamp require statement is more exclusive than the first, making the first redundant.
block.timestamp
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-paladin/blob/9c26ec8556298fb1dc3cf71f471aadad3a5c74a0/contracts/HolyPaladinToken.sol#L1280-L1283
This is wanted, to allow the user (or the devs) to know why the Lock could not be kicked, based on the current timestamp.
Issue 1 - Redundant requires
Detail
In the following code, the second
block.timestamp
require statement is more exclusive than the first, making the first redundant.Code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-paladin/blob/9c26ec8556298fb1dc3cf71f471aadad3a5c74a0/contracts/HolyPaladinToken.sol#L1280-L1283