Open code423n4 opened 2 years ago
Issue Information: G001 - variables with default value
../code4rena/2022-03-prepo/contracts/core/AccountAccessController.sol::44 => for (uint256 _i = 0; _i < _accounts.length; _i++) { ../code4rena/2022-03-prepo/contracts/core/AccountAccessController.sol::55 => for (uint256 _i = 0; _i < _accounts.length; _i++) { ../code4rena/2022-03-prepo/contracts/core/Collateral.sol::81 => uint256 _shares = 0;
Issue Information: G002 - array length outside loop
../code4rena/2022-03-prepo/contracts/core/AccountAccessController.sol::44 => for (uint256 _i = 0; _i < _accounts.length; _i++) { ../code4rena/2022-03-prepo/contracts/core/AccountAccessController.sol::55 => for (uint256 _i = 0; _i < _accounts.length; _i++) {
Issue Information: G003 - use !=0 for unsigned int comparison
../code4rena/2022-03-prepo/contracts/core/Collateral.sol::326 => (_totalAssets > 0) ../code4rena/2022-03-prepo/contracts/core/mocks/MockStrategy.sol::63 => if (_actualBalance > 0) {
Issue Information: G009 - Prefix increments are cheaper than postfix increments
../code4rena/2022-03-prepo/contracts/core/AccountAccessController.sol::35 => _blockedAccountsIndex++; ../code4rena/2022-03-prepo/contracts/core/AccountAccessController.sol::44 => for (uint256 _i = 0; _i < _accounts.length; _i++) { ../code4rena/2022-03-prepo/contracts/core/AccountAccessController.sol::55 => for (uint256 _i = 0; _i < _accounts.length; _i++) { ../code4rena/2022-03-prepo/contracts/core/AccountAccessController.sol::101 => _allowedAccountsIndex++;
Duplicates issues mentioned in #5 and #18
Issues found
Don't Initialize Variables with Default Value
Impact
Issue Information: G001 - variables with default value
Findings:
Cache Array Length Outside of Loop
Impact
Issue Information: G002 - array length outside loop
Findings:
Use != 0 instead of > 0 for Unsigned Integer Comparison
Impact
Issue Information: G003 - use !=0 for unsigned int comparison
Findings:
Prefix increments are cheaper than postfix increments
Impact
Issue Information: G009 - Prefix increments are cheaper than postfix increments
Findings: