Closed code423n4 closed 2 years ago
Contract should make use of _sendValueWithFallbackWithdraw() instead of sendValue(). This will ensure invalid transfers are correctly handled.
contracts/Withdrawer.sol:29: Address.sendValue(payable(msg.sender), amount);
Use _sendValueWithFallbackWithdraw() instead of sendValue()
Unknown function Warden could give more info ?
Warden submitted multiple QA Reports. Will not be judged.
_sendValueWithFallbackWithdraw() instead of sendValue()
Contract should make use of _sendValueWithFallbackWithdraw() instead of sendValue(). This will ensure invalid transfers are correctly handled.
Instances:
Recommendation
Use _sendValueWithFallbackWithdraw() instead of sendValue()