Open code423n4 opened 2 years ago
The owner will be our multisig
Per the rulebook will bulk all Admin Privilege findings under this one.
Most notably the main issue was the lack of validation on the flashloan fee, which this issue acts as an umbrella for
GalloDaSballo marked the issue as primary issue
GalloDaSballo marked the issue as selected for report
Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-traderjoe/blob/main/src/libraries/PendingOwnable.sol#L42
Vulnerability details
Vulnerability details
Typically, the contract’s owner is the account that deploys the contract. As a result, the owner is able to perform certain privileged activities.
However, Owner privileges are numerous and there is no timelock structure in the process of using these privileges. The Owner is assumed to be an EOA, since the documents do not provide information on whether the Owner will be a multisign structure.
In parallel with the private key thefts of the project owners, which have increased recently, this vulnerability has been stated as medium.
Similar vulnerability; Private keys stolen:
Hackers have stolen cryptocurrency worth around €552 million from a blockchain project linked to the popular online game Axie Infinity, in one of the largest cryptocurrency heists on record. Security issue : PrivateKey of the project officer was stolen: https://www.euronews.com/next/2022/03/30/blockchain-network-ronin-hit-by-552-million-crypto-heist
Proof of Concept
onlyOwner
powers;Recommendation;
1- A timelock contract should be added to use
onlyOwner
privileges. In this way, users can be warned in case of a possible security weakness. 2-onlyOwner
can be a Multisign wallet and this part is specified in the documentation