Open code423n4 opened 1 year ago
NC00 driverId offset is hardcoded in the driver contracts R
NC01 Wrong and confusing naming of variable in AddressDriver.t.sol Disputing due to test file
NC02 Unit tests are missing comments Saem
L01 Incomplete/missing NatSpec tags in function comments NC
L02 Extensive usage of slither-disable, posing a risk, and also causing source code deterioration Disputing in lack of specific example
L03 DOS condition when registering type(uint32).max number of drivers R, don't think it's a realistic risk
L04 Wrong and misleading comment in DripsHub.sol R
L05 DOS condition when adding max amount of tokens to drips balance L
L06 Wrong and misleading comment, plus possible risk for future code changes NC
L07 Bad english in comment in DripsHub.sol, can be misleading NC
L08 Certain ERC20 tokens like UNI and COMP are not compatible with the AddressDriver contract L
L09 Wrong parameter name used for NatSpec tag in function comment NC
L10 Wrong NatSpec tag used in function comment NC
2L 3R 5NC
GalloDaSballo marked the issue as grade-b
See the markdown file with the details of this report here.