search

code-423n4 / 2023-08-arbitrum-findings

3 stars 3 forks source link

Analysis #183

Open code423n4 opened 1 year ago

code423n4 commented 1 year ago

See the markdown file with the details of this report here.

c4-judge commented 1 year ago

0xean marked the issue as grade-c

yixxas commented 1 year ago

Hi @0xean, I would like to understand why this was marked as grade-c.

I tried my best to write my analysis in a way in which it can be beneficial for the protocol. I wrote my thoughts specifically for the rules governing and around the security council (which is the entire scope of the audit).

In fact, issue #97 is currently accepted as a medium severity issue despite this being the current implementation specification. If 9/12 security council members decides to collude and add a removed member that was voted out, they can definitely do much more than that. The fact that they can pass any emergency proposal means they can undermine any DAO votes anyway. This is by design.

0xean commented 1 year ago

These grades are not used for scoring and are being deprecated with only advanced-analysis being used in the future.

I will upgrade this, but it has no effect on anything.

c4-judge commented 1 year ago

0xean marked the issue as grade-b