code-423n4 / 2023-11-panoptic-findings

0 stars 0 forks source link

Premium computation is wrong when user go full long on a positionKey #483

Open c4-bot-4 opened 9 months ago

c4-bot-4 commented 9 months ago

Lines of code

https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-11-panoptic/blob/f75d07c345fd795f907385868c39bafcd6a56624/contracts/SemiFungiblePositionManager.sol#L1255-L1329

Vulnerability details

Impact

Premium computation is wrong when user want to create a long position. Any protocol that will be created on top of sfpm cannot rely on premium computation of sfpm.

For instance, an user want to short an lp position by first minting an liquidity position on uniswap v3 through sfpm, and then going long (isLong = 1) on the entire liquidity minted previously. In that case, getAccountPremium of sfpm will always return 0 for both tokens. In that case, the premium should be feeGrowthX128 * T * (1+ spread).

Proof of Concept

// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED
pragma solidity ^0.8.0;

import "forge-std/Test.sol";
import "forge-std/Vm.sol";

import {SemiFungiblePositionManager} from "@contracts/SemiFungiblePositionManager.sol";
import {TokenId} from "@types/TokenId.sol";
import {LeftRight} from "@types/LeftRight.sol";

import {IERC20} from "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol";
import {IUniswapV3Factory} from "v3-core/interfaces/IUniswapV3Factory.sol";
import {IUniswapV3Pool} from "v3-core/interfaces/IUniswapV3Pool.sol";
import {TickMath} from "v3-core/libraries/TickMath.sol";
import {ISwapRouter} from "v3-periphery/interfaces/ISwapRouter.sol";
import {ERC1155Holder} from "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC1155/utils/ERC1155Holder.sol";

contract PremiumComputationTest is Test, ERC1155Holder {

    using TokenId for uint256;
    using LeftRight for uint256;
    using LeftRight for uint128;
    using LeftRight for int256;

    IERC20 constant public USDC = IERC20(0xA0b86991c6218b36c1d19D4a2e9Eb0cE3606eB48);
    IERC20 constant public WETH = IERC20(0xC02aaA39b223FE8D0A0e5C4F27eAD9083C756Cc2);
    ISwapRouter constant public SWAPROUTER = ISwapRouter(0xE592427A0AEce92De3Edee1F18E0157C05861564);
    IUniswapV3Factory constant public FACTORY = IUniswapV3Factory(0x1F98431c8aD98523631AE4a59f267346ea31F984);
    uint24 constant public FEETIER = 500;

    SemiFungiblePositionManager public sfpm;
    IUniswapV3Pool public pool;

    function setUp() public {
        sfpm = new SemiFungiblePositionManager(FACTORY);
        pool = IUniswapV3Pool(FACTORY.getPool(address(USDC), address(WETH), FEETIER));

        // #region initialize pool on sfpm.

        sfpm.initializeAMMPool(address(USDC), address(WETH), FEETIER);

        // #endregion initialize pool on sfpm.
    }

    uint128 public positionSize;
    uint64 public poolId;
    uint160 public sqrtPriceX96;
    int24 public tick;
    int24 public tickSpacing;
    int24 public strike;
    int24 public width;
    uint256 public tokenId;
    uint256 public wethBalance;
    uint128 public premiumToken0;
    uint128 public premiumToken1;

    function test_premium_computation() public {
        // #region input params.

        positionSize = 1e18;

        poolId = sfpm.getPoolId(address(pool));

        // #endregion input params.
        // #region create strike.

        (
            sqrtPriceX96,
            tick,
            ,
            ,
            ,
            ,

        ) = pool.slot0();

        tickSpacing = pool.tickSpacing();

        strike = (tick > 0 ? tick / tickSpacing : -tick / tickSpacing) * tickSpacing;

        strike = strike - tickSpacing;

        // #endregion create strike.

        // #region create width.

        width = 2;

        // #endregion create width.

        deal(address(WETH), address(this), 1e18);

        WETH.approve(address(sfpm), 1e18);

        tokenId = uint256(0).addUniv3pool(poolId).addLeg(
            0,
            1,
            1,
            0,
            0,
            0,
            strike,
            width
        );

        sfpm.mintTokenizedPosition(
            tokenId,
            positionSize,
            TickMath.MIN_TICK,
            TickMath.MAX_TICK
        );

        tokenId = uint256(0).addUniv3pool(poolId).addLeg(
            0,
            1,
            1,
            1,
            0,
            0,
            strike,
            width
        );

        sfpm.mintTokenizedPosition(
            tokenId,
            positionSize,
            TickMath.MIN_TICK,
            TickMath.MAX_TICK
        );

        // #region create a swap that make the position cross.

        deal(address(USDC), address(this), 100_000_000 * 1e6);

        USDC.approve(address(SWAPROUTER), 100_000_000 * 1e6);

        SWAPROUTER.exactInputSingle(ISwapRouter.ExactInputSingleParams({
            tokenIn : address(USDC),
            tokenOut : address(WETH),
            fee : 500,
            recipient: address(this),
            deadline: type(uint256).max,
            amountIn : 100_000_000 * 1e6,
            amountOutMinimum: 0,
            sqrtPriceLimitX96: TickMath.getSqrtRatioAtTick(strike - (2 * tickSpacing))
        }));

        deal(address(WETH), address(this), 100_000 * 1e18);

        WETH.approve(address(SWAPROUTER), 100_000 * 1e18);

        SWAPROUTER.exactInputSingle(ISwapRouter.ExactInputSingleParams({
            tokenIn : address(WETH),
            tokenOut : address(USDC),
            fee : 500,
            recipient: address(this),
            deadline: type(uint256).max,
            amountIn : 100_000 * 1e18,
            amountOutMinimum: 0,
            sqrtPriceLimitX96: TickMath.getSqrtRatioAtTick(tick)
        }));

        // #endregion create a swap that make the position cross.

        // #region burn the position.

        {tokenId = uint256(0).addUniv3pool(poolId).addLeg(
            0,
            1,
            1,
            1,
            0,
            0,
            strike,
            width
        );}

        (
            sqrtPriceX96,
            tick,
            ,
            ,
            ,
            ,

        ) = pool.slot0();

        (premiumToken0, premiumToken1) = sfpm.getAccountPremium(address(pool), address(this), 0, strike - tickSpacing, strike + tickSpacing, tick, 0);

        console.logUint(premiumToken0);
        console.logUint(premiumToken1);

        (premiumToken0, premiumToken1) = sfpm.getAccountPremium(address(pool), address(this), 0, strike - tickSpacing, strike + tickSpacing, tick, 1);

        console.logUint(premiumToken0);
        console.logUint(premiumToken1);

        deal(address(WETH), address(this), 1e18);

        wethBalance = WETH.balanceOf(address(this));

        WETH.approve(address(sfpm), 1e18);

        sfpm.burnTokenizedPosition(
            tokenId,
            positionSize,
            TickMath.MIN_TICK,
            TickMath.MAX_TICK
        );

        tokenId = uint256(0).addUniv3pool(poolId).addLeg(
            0,
            1,
            1,
            0,
            0,
            0,
            strike,
            width
        );

        sfpm.burnTokenizedPosition(
            tokenId,
            positionSize,
            TickMath.MIN_TICK,
            TickMath.MAX_TICK
        );

        // #region burn the position.

        (
            sqrtPriceX96,
            tick,
            ,
            ,
            ,
            ,

        ) = pool.slot0();

        (premiumToken0, premiumToken1) = sfpm.getAccountPremium(address(pool), address(this), 0, strike - tickSpacing, strike + tickSpacing, tick, 0);

        console.logUint(premiumToken0);
        console.logUint(premiumToken1);

        (premiumToken0, premiumToken1) = sfpm.getAccountPremium(address(pool), address(this), 0, strike - tickSpacing, strike + tickSpacing, tick, 1);

        console.logUint(premiumToken0);
        console.logUint(premiumToken1);
    }
}

Tools Used

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Forbid going long on the entire liquidity minted.

Assessed type

Invalid Validation

dyedm1 commented 9 months ago

dup #211, It's important to note that this account premium calculation is not actually used anywhere within the SFPM, and is an opinionated calculation exposed for optional use by protocols such as Panoptic to price options.

With that being said, part of the opinionated definition of that calculation includes a multiplier on the premium for option buyers based on the utilization on a given chunk. As is illustrated by this graph of the relationship between the utilization and the premium multiplier, there is a vertical asymptote at 100% utilization. Thus, it is expected that protocols using this feature will cap utilization at a certain percentage (for example, Panoptic allows a maximum utilization of 90%).

The long premium calculations at a utilization of 100% (where netLiquidity=0) cannot be performed because the multiplier approaches infinity and would be undefined at that utilization. In that situation, it makes the most sense to forego the premium calculation. Protocols who use this calculation should understand this behavior and either implement a utilization cap or accept that premium will be 0 at utilization=100%

c4-sponsor commented 9 months ago

dyedm1 (sponsor) disputed

c4-judge commented 9 months ago

Picodes marked the issue as duplicate of #211

c4-judge commented 8 months ago

Picodes changed the severity to QA (Quality Assurance)

c4-judge commented 8 months ago

Picodes marked the issue as grade-b