search

code-423n4 / 2024-01-opus-findings

0 stars 0 forks source link

QA Report #238

Closed c4-bot-4 closed 9 months ago

c4-bot-4 commented 10 months ago

See the markdown file with the details of this report here.

c4-pre-sort commented 9 months ago

bytes032 marked the issue as sufficient quality report

tserg commented 9 months ago

Good quality report.

c4-judge commented 9 months ago

alex-ppg marked the issue as grade-c

mivgubel commented 9 months ago

Hi!

Like the Sponsor's comment, I think this is a good-quality report, I would like to know why it was classified as grade-c ? if even the sponsor accepted it as a good-quality report.

alex-ppg commented 9 months ago

Hey @mivgubel, thank you for requesting additional feedback on this QA report. While the pre-sort and sponsor may have considered this an acceptable report, I graded this as a C report because only one quantifiable recommendation stems from it; finding 7 which is labeled as QA (NC).

All the other findings are very generic / OOS (i.e. TODOs, documentation, plausibility, duplicate code, optimizations), and thus I consider my original judgment valid.