Open c4-judge opened 3 months ago
Not dup of #88 and QA, because it does not mention the key OUSGInstantManager functions. Even though it would theoretically make sense, I would not see the contract breaking ERC20 compatibility to support transfer
with slippage check, so this can stay low.
This auto-generated issue was withdrawn by 3docSec
3docSec marked the issue as grade-b
Judge has assessed an item in Issue #279 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows:
[L-06] Some functions can be vulnerable to Slippage