QA Report

[c4-bot-4]

See the markdown file with the details of this report here.

[alex-ppg]

This submission has been marked as C (unsatisfactory) due to containing an excessive number of invalid/false positive findings.

All QA reports were subject to the same restriction of an above 50% accuracy, and this submission failed to exceed the threshold.

[c4-judge]

alex-ppg marked the issue as grade-c

[albahaca0000]

Hi @alex-ppg Thank you for judging

I hope you're doing well. Upon review, I noticed similarities between my findings and those of another report,by 'hihen,' graded as an A. You can find their report here.

I kindly request a review of my report for and consistency, and to reconsider the grade assigned. Any additional feedback would be appreciated.

Thank you

[albahaca0000]

summary of my report

Total low : 36 Total NC : 113

[alex-ppg]

Hey @albahaca0000, thanks for contributing to the PJQA process! As I noted in my response, the 50% accuracy threshold has not been met by your report. In detail, 21 out of 36 low-risk findings were deemed invalid. In detail, the following exhibits were considered incorrect: L-01, L-02, L-03, L-05, L-07, L-11, L-12, L-14, L-16, L-21, L-22 (duplicate), L-24, L-26, L-27 (duplicate), L-29, L-30, L-31, L-32, L-33, L-34 (duplicate), L-35 (duplicate)

After a re-review, more findings were deemed invalid beyond the 21 original ones outlined above thus rendering the submission's grade to be final.