QA Report

[howlbot-integration[bot]]

See the markdown file with the details of this report here.

[c4-judge]

Picodes marked the issue as grade-a

[c4-judge]

Picodes marked the issue as grade-c

[c4-judge]

Picodes marked the issue as grade-a

[Picodes]

This report's formatting is good but reported issues aren't that valuable as they mainly come from static analysis

[CrystallineButterfly]

Hello there @Picodes

I would like to respectfully claim this is a QA report, that is worthy of the grade A it was given and is worthy of the top 3 based on:

The following reasons =

• I claim the majority are valid and utilising them will better improve the contracts, debugging, documentation and clarity of use.

• I claim all can be considered low, I used the umbrella of NC as I was unaware of the recent updates. Which I have noted for next time. Given this I move to claim they are all worthy of the Low label. As low vs non critical is a blurry line.

• I do not see any as invalid in my own analysis. All 43 to me I deem valid. But am open to critics with sufficient proof, that would better improve the quality and value of the report next time. And I would also like to add these were not done, from static analysis. For obvious reasons I will not breakdown my process.

• My claim here is simply they are valuable with respect to the contracts. And comparatively with the other reports. Which offer great value to. And that given the 43 suggestions, I claim the majority of my suggestions are valid and useful. And therefore the label It has been given is valid, and I see my report as worthy of the top 3 comparatively with the other grade A reports. Which are very good. I do not make any claims in my report that exaggerate or assert false potentials. And stuck to an unbiased process. As best as I could.

All the best - K

[Picodes]

@CrystallineButterfly most of the issues are definitely NC. Note that the 3 reports haven't been selected yet and will be chosen following a vote between the judge and the validators

[CrystallineButterfly]

Ok thank you @Picodes 🙏