Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
There are a lot of missing pieces in the spec, which as you know is WIP, but
this is actually not a mistake in the table. There should be no content data
type column, because the content type can be toggled using a field in the
stream structure (see Table 11.)
However, the caption is obviously incorrect. Thanks for mentioning.
Original comment by bengtric...@gmail.com
on 15 Aug 2012 at 12:22
Ah I see: It is actually a reference to Table 5. Perhaps the naming convention
should be changed in Table 11 from "content data type" to "field type"? It's
the only place in the document where the term content data type is used.
Original comment by pr...@ibbgdv.de
on 15 Aug 2012 at 12:28
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
pr...@ibbgdv.de
on 15 Aug 2012 at 12:19