Closed slandelle closed 5 years ago
Hi @slandelle
I can understand the problem here. Basically, I'd like to keep the two parts "gatling" and "jdbc" somehow in the artifact name. Is there any recommendation from you, which naming scheme third-party libraries should follow?
Cheers, Ronny
Is there any recommendation from you, which naming scheme third-party libraries should follow?
Third party maven plugins tend to switch order, eg maven-scala-plugin
became scala-maven-plugin
.
So here, it would be jdbc-gatling
.
Or have prefix, eg codecentric-gatling-jdbc
.
Thanks for your understanding.
Done with 1135364e695edfb41d5de40c6fe20c2a5ff4717c
Thanks a lot!
Hi there,
I know this request is a PITA, all the more as this project is actively developed and is seems to be gaining more traction. Sadly, the artifact id you picked clashes with
io.gatling:gatling-jdbc
(that contains the code forjdbcFeeder
). It brings confusion and one can't have both when using Gatling's bundle distrib.Maybe at some point we'll forbid third parties to use the
gatling-
prefix to avoid such confusion and clashes, just like maven does.Could you please consider renaming it?
Kind regards