codecheckers / discussion

General discussions and questions
0 stars 0 forks source link

Report community codechecks to ORCID with a bot #6

Open nuest opened 4 years ago

nuest commented 4 years ago

Can we complete rule 3 for community codechecks?

Peer review information can only be provided by "trusted organisations":

That should be achievable and is more a technical problem, AFAICT. This could be the first task or our bot (see #2).

JOSS reports reviews to ORCID, but I didn't find any code that would streamline this in https://github.com/openjournals/joss/search?p=3&q=orcid&unscoped_q=orcid or in https://github.com/openjournals/whedon/search?p=2&q=orcid&unscoped_q=orcid ... maybe I'm looking in the wrong spot.

nuest commented 3 years ago

This could be a bot running on Heroku, similar to the Whedon API Bot - see https://github.com/openjournals/whedon-api, or https://github.com/openjournals/buffy

# deposit codechecks in ORCID profiles all codecheckers
@cdchck acknowledge codecheckers of 2020-001

# deposit codechecks of specific checker to ORCID profile
@cdchck acknowledge 0000-0000-0000-0000 of 2020-001