Open sje30 opened 4 years ago
Good point. Do we need separate fields for preprint DOI (which was checked) and the published paper? Not in this case, but differences might occur, tough that could be the easier case: if there are differences, then we don't update anything.
If there are no differences, as is the case with 2010-008
. The codecheck.yml
currently only has
reference: <https://cmmid.github.io/topics/covid19/control-measures/report/uk_scenario_modelling_preprint_2020_04_01.pdf>
source
field be used to describe the history?OTOH, maybe we deliberately don't reference the paper at all, because the CODECHECK was only for the preprint version of code and data, and we should only have a reference to the article if the CODECHECK was a "journal check" (not a "community codecheck") ?
More thoughts than answers at this point.
The covid-uk study (2010-008) has now been published; how do we cite to the paper, as a follow up?
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30133-X