codecheckers / paper

Manuscript about CODECHECK
https://codecheck.org.uk
2 stars 0 forks source link

CODCHECK vs. NISO badges recommendations #5

Open nuest opened 3 years ago

nuest commented 3 years ago

[Just noting this here if there is a revision made.]

https://doi.org/10.3789/niso-rp-31-2021

It's a pity that they have ROR-R (reproduced) only as an extension of ROR (reviewed), whereas CODECHECK does reproduction without too much code review. Could go into future work?

Also, the idea to add a crpytographic hash in the image header for authentication of the badge source is interesting, but would require an own badge server.

nuest commented 3 years ago

@sje30 This goes in a similar direction as the reviewer comment about encoding information in the badge, right?

sje30 commented 3 years ago

ok, but suggest we leave for now.