It's a pity that they have ROR-R (reproduced) only as an extension of ROR (reviewed), whereas CODECHECK does reproduction without too much code review. Could go into future work?
Also, the idea to add a crpytographic hash in the image header for authentication of the badge source is interesting, but would require an own badge server.
[Just noting this here if there is a revision made.]
https://doi.org/10.3789/niso-rp-31-2021
It's a pity that they have
ROR-R
(reproduced) only as an extension ofROR
(reviewed), whereas CODECHECK does reproduction without too much code review. Could go into future work?Also, the idea to add a crpytographic hash in the image header for authentication of the badge source is interesting, but would require an own badge server.