search

codecheckers / paper

Manuscript about CODECHECK
https://codecheck.org.uk
2 stars 0 forks source link

Preprint feedback #6

Closed nuest closed 3 years ago

nuest commented 3 years ago

The papers is published with F1000Research and undergoes an open review process. Please leave comments directly at the preprint page https://f1000research.com/login?originalPath=/articles/10-253/v1&scrollTo=add-new-comment

nuest commented 3 years ago

We noticed an inconsistent use of the terms "workflow" and "process", and decided to use "CODECHECK workflow" and "publication process" in the revision of the manuscript.

nuest commented 3 years ago

Related recent work - CODECHECK also does a kind of segmentation: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936523320304770

nuest commented 3 years ago

This is so awesome, I want to find a way to mention it in related work :-) https://ascelibrary.org/doi/full/10.1061/%28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0001368

(a diamond journal would of course even be better)

nuest commented 3 years ago

Self-awarded badges here (editor just clicks the links): https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/environmental-data-science/information/instructions-for-authors

Worth mentioning?

nuest commented 3 years ago

@sje30 I had an unchecked task about the "workflow" vs. "process" wording on my own board and worked through the document trying to improve it. I also handled the other notes from this issue, but I'm also happy if you reject those change suggestions and we focus on the reviewer's comments.