Open timoffex opened 1 week ago
I'm seeing a little bit more (also using the new 5.0.0 orb):
_____ _
/ ____| | |
| | ___ __| | ___ ___ _____ __
| | / _ \ / _` |/ _ \/ __/ _ \ \ / /
| |___| (_) | (_| | __/ (_| (_) \ V /
\_____\___/ \__,_|\___|\___\___/ \_/
Wrapper-0.0.17
==> Detected linux
-> Downloading https://cli.codecov.io/latest/linux/codecov
==> Finishing downloading linux:latest
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
100 3187 100 3187 0 0 26719 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 26558
gpg: directory '/home/circleci/.gnupg' created
gpg: keybox '/home/circleci/.gnupg/pubring.kbx' created
gpg: /home/circleci/.gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
gpg: key 806BB28AED779869: public key "Codecov Uploader (Codecov Uploader Verification Key) <security@codecov.io>" imported
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1
==> Verifying GPG signature integrity
-> Downloading https://cli.codecov.io/latest/linux/codecov.SHA256SUM
-> Downloading https://cli.codecov.io/latest/linux/codecov.SHA256SUM.sig
gpg: Signature made Fri 18 Oct 2024 09:02:53 AM PDT
gpg: using RSA key 27034E7FDB850E0BBC2C62FF806BB28AED779869
gpg: Good signature from "Codecov Uploader (Codecov Uploader Verification Key) <security@codecov.io>" [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 2703 4E7F DB85 0E0B BC2C 62FF 806B B28A ED77 9869
codecov: OK
==> CLI integrity verified
environment: line 4: $1: unbound variable
Exited with code exit status 1
Private repo so I can't share the job, sorry. Here's the relevant step:
- codecov/upload:
files: /tmp/circleci-artifacts/*/coverage/coverage.json
when: always
cc @thomasrockhu-codecov
on it, thanks @timoffex @quantizor
@timoffex how are you running the orb (i.e. what arguments are you using?)
My
codecov/upload
step fromcodecov/codecov@5.0.0
failed with the following message:There is no more information. It only failed for one of many parallel runs, so I expect it'll work after rerunning (which unfortunately means rerunning the tests as well). Could the error message be made more clear / could the command be made more robust? Thank you!