Research e-signature - Githubissues

lippytak commented 9 years ago

Current problems:

Doesn't work on Windows RT at all, which is what the Food Bank uses for app assistance
Doing a signature on a mouse or trackpad is painful and requires pretty fine motor control
The signature area is too small and should probably have it's own view (see #297)

Options/next steps from best to worst:

Let's ditch a physical signature and use an e-signature instead
- I will discuss with Deven (CfA lawyer) today
- I will discuss with CDSS lawyer asap (hopefully next week)
- Depending on their feedback, I'll get the :+1: from Leo
If not, let's try to fix the signature area on Windows RT (I'll either buy one or get one from FB to test)
If not, let's just buy other tablets for the Food Bank + check with Jennifer on getting corporate donations from Google

We'll include this in next week's sprint plan. Good? Good.

lippytak commented 9 years ago

MBCW, C4 and LEADER for context: mbcw-signature

leader-signature

c4-signature

lippytak commented 9 years ago

Possible windows RT fix documented here: https://github.com/brinley/jSignature/issues/29

Also worth testing using the official demo to see if our code may be causing the problem: http://willowsystems.github.io/jSignature/#/demo/

lippytak commented 9 years ago

Motivation from a user Lisa: https://github.com/codeforamerica/health/wiki/User-research#20150217-lisa-at-meda

lippytak commented 9 years ago

Summary of my convo with our friendly neighborhood lawyer, Deven:

We can do e-sig in CA
Checkbox + typed name + store the data (date, name, checkbox, etc.) more than suffices
See below for more info she sent along

We're done with research. Next step is to make it happen: https://github.com/codeforamerica/clean/issues/375

Link to the California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act - http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=civ&group=01001-02000&file=1633.1-1633.17 See section 1633.2(h) for the definition of what constitutes an electronic signature; 1633.4 (applies to any electronic record generated sent or stored after 1/1/2000); 1633.5(b) applies to transactions where both parties have agreed to conduct the transaction electronically, and such agreement is determined by context and surrounding circumstances, including actual conduct; 1633.7 (a record may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form); 1633.9(a) – an electronic signature is attributable to a person if it was the act of a person, which may be shown “in any manner” (no id proofing required).

Letter from DSS instructing counties to accept telephonic signatures - http://www.dss.cahwnet.gov/lettersnotices/EntRes/getinfo/acin/2013/I-60_13.pdf

I also found this in my own research, which seem to be an online application for CalFRESH: http://www.benefitsapplication.com/program_info/CA/CalFresh?gclid=Cj0KEQiA37CnBRChp7e-pM2Mzp0BEiQAlSxQCAL1dqc-ONF6c0xrK34JMctV_hWWQ-PkqjCAzEyKek8aAlgo8P8HAQ

daguar commented 9 years ago

Sweet — @lippytak, mind migrating the info/links to the Wiki as well?

(As incentive, I will reopen this issue. :D )

lippytak commented 9 years ago

Great call will do.

On Tuesday, February 24, 2015, Dave Guarino notifications@github.com wrote:

Reopened #326 https://github.com/codeforamerica/clean/issues/326.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/codeforamerica/clean/issues/326#event-241422651.

lippytak commented 9 years ago

https://github.com/codeforamerica/health/wiki/Research#electronic-signatures-in-ca

codeforamerica / clean

Research e-signature #326