Open lippytak opened 9 years ago
How do we want to do this with the cleanest UX?
If we were to set aside return on investment considerations, I think the cleanest and most valuable UX would be the "Venmo Way", which would be immediate notification/confirmation that we have your number and can use it effectively. This would include:
On the other end of the spectrum, we could simply *require the phone number
In either case, I can imagine capturing some value by breaking phone number into its own view.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Dave Guarino notifications@github.com wrote:
How do we want to do this with the cleanest UX?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/codeforamerica/clean/issues/472#issuecomment-90610091 .
t: @alanjosephwilli p: 817 713 6264
For v1 I was thinking of just asking the user to input it twice. Maybe 'confirmation' was the wrong word...I think SMS confirmation is overkill at this point.
You think I've prematurely optimized???
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Jake Solomon notifications@github.com wrote:
For v1 I was thinking of just asking the user to input it twice. Maybe 'confirmation' was the wrong word...I think SMS confirmation is overkill at this point.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/codeforamerica/clean/issues/472#issuecomment-90730497 .
t: @alanjosephwilli p: 817 713 6264
I'm going to implement a narrowly scoped enhancement on this front this sprint:
Feel free to wordsmith that copy—but the point is to avoid asking a question that would need a response interaction to be sensible. Instead, simply give the assister and client a chance to see the number they entered (and by extension, change it) before they move on.
This is the most important question. If someone makes a typo on their phone # then their odds of approval plummet.