CJA Score Should be a Filter Option

codeforamerica / criminal_case_search

Prototype app for filtering NYC Arrest/Arraignment data based on flexible criteria.

BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License

6 stars 2 forks source link

CJA Score Should be a Filter Option #97

Open djoaquin opened 10 years ago

yesezra commented 10 years ago

@waltz was already working on this. What's the status?

waltz commented 10 years ago

I'm confused: I'm assigned, but I haven't started working on it yet. Is this a duplicate issue somehow?

On September 19, 2013 at 10:15:25 AM, Ezra Spier (notifications@github.com) wrote:

@waltz was already working on this. What's the status?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

djoaquin commented 10 years ago

CJA Score is showing up in the filter results but right now you cannot filter by this category.

yesezra commented 10 years ago

I can't find another issue. But I remember seeing you working on this a couple weeks ago. The options you should be able to filter on are:

["ROR", "Bail Set", "Pleaded Guilty", "Dismissed"]

yesezra commented 10 years ago

Nobody caught my mistake in the last comment! That's a list of arraignment outcomes, not ROR recommendations.

The CJA data comes through a little dirty – looks like a lot of user-entered data. I looked through my example data and picked out the ones that occur most often and seem most relevant. They are:

"Bench warrant attached to NYSID"
"High risk for FTA"
"Moderate risk for ROR"
"No recommendation"
"Not recommended for ROR"
"Recommended for ROR"
"Defendant served in the military or reserves"

Which of these should be filterable? Should we use checkboxes?

djoaquin commented 10 years ago

These seems like too many choices to give users. I say for now we keep it out of the filter but keep it showing in the results.

yesezra commented 10 years ago

If we know which ratings people are looking for, we could list just ones and "Other." ATIs probably want people who are unlikely to be ROR, for example...