Open RebeccaCoelius opened 10 years ago
still trying to find a time that works for a call =(
To cheer you in the meantime:
this is amazing ^
States selected for initial attempt:
Brendan will pursue Alaska data simultaneously.
Jake spoke w/ Socrata this week about asking all of their customers to share data, will loop Rebecca into follow up.
Virginia update: Discussed w/ Danny Avula in person today. Will introduce us to his colleagues at TANF, is very supportive of the project.
I've also forwarded below a bit of proof that California has not only released the
Looks like # TANF recipients per state (and per capita I think) varies a LOT. Worth scoping the potential impact per state before putting in much work to get the data. In 2009 there were ~4M TANF recipients in the US and >1M of them were in CA. NY is second largest was ~250k. Here’s the ’09 data: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Pi62wo_5T4c2LCZFpwrbjZp5kVFrYSaHQTHqLZQ0U5Q/edit#gid=0 (source: https://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/social_insurance_human_services/supplemental_security_income_temporary_assistance_to_needy_families.html)
Regardless of scale there still seems to be a pretty big opp to improve this: (source: http://otda.ny.gov/programs/publications/5004.pdf)
Agreed. NY was #1 for that reason, others more so due to relationship like Danny.
Realizing though my personal blocker is more along lines of us not being very rigorous about how we decided this is best use of time for EBTNearMe. Have we really figured out how to use it in CA well? Are we ready to support and spread in another state? Why spread this vs other data types first in CA?
Not arguing so much as ensuring we ask + document those questions.
On Monday, December 22, 2014, Jake Solomon notifications@github.com wrote:
Looks like # TANF recipients per state (and per capita I think) varies a LOT. Worth scoping the potential impact per state before putting in much work to get the data. In 2009 there were ~4M TANF recipients in the US and
1M of them were in CA. NY is second largest was ~250k. Here’s the ’09 data: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Pi62wo_5T4c2LCZFpwrbjZp5kVFrYSaHQTHqLZQ0U5Q/edit#gid=0 (source: https://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/social_insurance_human_services/supplemental_security_income_temporary_assistance_to_needy_families.html )
Regardless of scale there still seems to be a pretty big opp to improve this: [image: screen shot 2014-12-22 at 9 10 52 am] https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/2533112/5528256/f0ecf25a-89ba-11e4-9ab0-020f33208bc1.png (source: http://otda.ny.gov/programs/publications/5004.pdf)
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/codeforamerica/health/issues/18#issuecomment-67863251 .
Rebecca Coelius, MD Code for America 415 298 2872 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/rebeccacoelius Twitter http://twitter.com/#!/RebeccaCoelius
Want to discuss whether to put this on hold w/ team even given EBTNearMe status.
list of states and their EBT/TANF vendors: http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/snap/electronic-benefits-transfer-ebt-status-report-state.pdf
Bother Fred Trotter about atm data and physician network data, then circle back w/ Andrew and Hannah.