Open alanjosephwilliams opened 8 years ago
I'm going to recap what we know already, from our own data on GCF and Caroline's research on MBCW, as we prep to share with others in the org and scope the next tranche of work.
First up, GCF data: (All of Jan/Feb 2016, excluding Feb 29)
Step | Users | Data Source |
---|---|---|
visitors to /apply from /county |
1.3k (66%) | GA |
visitors that drop off at /county |
677 (34%) | GA |
typeform sessions initiated (saws-driver IDs created) | 1018 | saws-driver |
typeform apps submitted (dupes removed) | 449 | GCF-cases |
typeform conversion rate | 44.1% | saws-driver/GCF-cases |
MBCW data, from Caroline's research: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1A5l1x0QiahDJlov3qHyEb_uP2NszdGnRTwud_ueOlrA/edit (Summer 2015)
Population is defined as those that responded to a survey request and follow up interview.
Step | Users |
---|---|
Shown screener | 2,222 |
Screener responses | 111 |
Phone Interview (1 hr to 2 days | 30 |
30-Day Follow Ups | 15 |
To clarify the SD #, I'm pretty AdWords are off so I'm not sure that we know what max'd out AdWords blitz on SD would yield.
(Ah I misunderstood, that was copy/pasted; but the general point that we could blitz SD [maybe SF too?] and get a fair # is right to me.)
FYI — I just realized that our numbers from Typeform unique IDs are an underestimate of our conversion since right now both (1) our manual testing of the site [locally or on dev], as well as (2) our automated test suite's integration tests, actually visit the Typeform, which increments that #.
If we want/need to change this to get numbers, let's make it a priority in the study.
@MatthewLoveless this is the public issue we have collecting our thinking to date.
Web app is up and live
GSpreadsheet is also :)
Matthew is going to give us a mid-flight update tomorrow
Recap of thinking about this project to date, piped over from private repos:
Originally spec'd out here
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EQuk9JVVFQ1df6Ui_GybsnV-E44BK7Y7K22k8QHCGOs/edit#heading=h.wqr0jsxjwkip
Quicker turnaround scope originally intended to be delivered before Reid pitch
By 22nd we can might be able to get a good baseline & comparison data for:
Roughly here's how we would do it:
Open Qs
Flow
High Level Summary of Activities & Costs
Summary
Cost