Closed m-tyler closed 1 year ago
Thanks very much for your SQL code there. That really helped put some context on this for me.
For the record, it's a very good idea, but also is a lot to maintain and handle errors for. This isn't me saying no, but I need some time to think about how viable this actually is.
Usually, I would recommend you get Rocket to be building their own extension to supply the views. We provide an API to extension authors to access the IBM i through their own extension. There are two other vendors working on their own extension for their change management. Rocket could do the same.
I am happy to advocate for this with you, also.
I have emailed someone at Rocket regarding this issue. Let's see if that goes somewhere!
Thanks for at least considering this. I have contacted Rocket about this but its unknown to me if they will or are working to provide an extension.
Unfortunately, I don't have an environment that allows me to develop this even as a separate extension, so I am at your mercy or Rockets.
No. I have not looked at the community forum for a while. I suppose I should have. But we have not been up to date with the Rocket products, I suspect it requires the new DevOps products in the IBM server and we are sadly too far behind at the moment.
@m-tyler I am happy to say that they did reply to us. Their extension is actually a fork of vscode-ibmi, instead of building their own from scratch and using our API. There are some downsides to this like other extensions (Db2 for i ext. and RPGLE language tools) not working correctly with their fork.
Hopefully we can all agree on the standard and continue to improve the base!
Provide a customer contribution point to supply
Object Browser
view information.The default source file and member list selections do not benefit me as much as I need. My company uses a source control product, Rocket Aldon, which allows me to create a small or large project and assign source to that project from the overall source set, which contains many thousands of source members. I don't like needing to constantly update the extension to allow me to use the details from out CMS product in the
Object Browser
for source files and members. Source files and member vary based on the CMS project I am current working on. I can have several CMS projects active and in various states, at one time, so I don't want to always see all members checked out to me, in different CMS projects. I would like to focus on a single CMS project member list when expanding the source and member lists.My ask is to...
user exit
point calls. One foruser
specific versions of the exit point function and one for thecompany
level use.admin
types to develop code to then pass out to all others without breaking their work during development.getObjetList()
in order to supply the table functions information with values I define in the filter.Examples of what I think the functions could be changed to handle this ask.
Initial table function templates for customers to modify on their own.
P.S., I would have modified this extension myself and submitted a PR but I have been unable to get my company laptop to build a development environment for this extension. So I am left with asking you to make the changes for this ask.