Closed joekarl closed 9 years ago
As per suggestion from @jvrousseau we probably only need point data for schools.
I agree with this. I don't see a reason why we need the polygons.
Hmm... something we'll need to take a look at, but I'm not super happy with the results of turning the school data into points. I took the polygon information and figured out the center point of the bounding box for each school. Unfortunately, that's not necessarily where the school is actually at (a lot of schools have more land around their buildings). Also some schools are actually multipolygons and the point can end up in weird spots between the multiple polygons.
As an example, check out the Piedmont schools (the ones furthest northeast on the map). They have large land areas and the point (while the center of the school land area) doesn't correspond with the school buildings which looks like bad data on a map. https://github.com/codeforokc/school-finder/blob/schools_as_points/data_ingest_node/data/schoolPoints.topojson
Closing this in favor of topojson polygons (added in #11)
Polygons for school data is overkill. Change to be points.