Candidate page UI issues/improvements

[ejanzer]

• [x] A - SideNav container padding causes H3s to be misaligned (the candidate's name should be aligned with the section headers beneath)

• [x] B - The 'See all contributions' text doesn't align properly with the arrow, doesn't match arrow color, and also doesn't do anything when you click on it (where should it go?) - Design is fixed, but currently no page to link it to

• [x] C - We're still missing profile photos. Should we ask for a default profile photo to use in case we can't get them all?

• [x] D - Voter's Edge link doesn't go anywhere, that needs to be added to candidate JSON file

• [x] E - Candidate description/bio (what should go there?) needs to be added to candidate JSON file

• [x] F - Fix positioning/wrap of bio links (row or col?)

• [x] G - Total contributions currently only includes RCPT. Do we want to include LOAN? If so, we need to update the aggregations on candidate and election for consistency (API changes needed).

• [x] H - We have a lot of expenditure data, so I'm currently only showing top 4 categories. Should we make this expandable?

• [x] I - Need more padding between sections

• [x] J - Text is wrapping too much in the chart labels, can we adjust the width/margin for the label to make it.. not do that?

• [X] K - Breakdown by region is currently missing the "In San José" category - need to get that from the API (when we do, we need to decide - should "In California" also include SJ, or no?)

~L - Both of the funding breakdowns are currently only including RCPT. Should they also include LOAN?~

• [ ] M - What should the office title be - 'District 4', 'District 4 Representative', 'Council Member District 4'? We currently have all 3 in different places, I think.

[ejanzer]

@alessandro-pianetta: Did you make note of the UX issues on the candidate page we talked about with Diane? I tried to just jot down everything I saw looking at the page just now, but I think I'm missing some stuff.

[alessandro-pianetta]

@ejanzer Yes, the notes I took ended up being kind of bad but I got a decent amount of them in #135 and #136.

EDIT: Or at least the notes I took; I don't think we went over some of these. I'll make sure to keep this issue open so I can reference them as I fix them.

[ejanzer]

Oh great, I should have checked out your PRs first! Yeah some of these are new as I'm working on hooking up the candidate data, I just wanted to make a note of them someplace as I thought of them.

[alessandro-pianetta]

For F I think we decided to render them as a column due to wrapping issues at smaller screen sizes between 1440 and the break point.