codegooglecom / snova

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/snova
0 stars 0 forks source link

gsnova0.16版似乎有内存泄漏的问题 #118

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
打开youtube比较明显,一段几分钟的视频内存占用就会升到40M�
��上,并且持续上升.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by disun...@gmail.com on 12 Oct 2012 at 7:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
这个问题,主要是Hosts下的InjectRange配置引起的,注释掉就没�
��问题了。默认直接访问youtube很慢,用这个多连接实现提高��
�问速度。
在0.17.0里修复

Original comment by yinqiwen@gmail.com on 12 Oct 2012 at 7:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
好像不行,我注释掉了那几行InjectRange的配置文件,也还是这样

Original comment by disun...@gmail.com on 12 Oct 2012 at 9:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
这个问题就是InjectRange引起的问题,已经修复了,这两天会编
译个正式的0.17.0

Original comment by yinqiwen@gmail.com on 12 Oct 2012 at 11:26

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
try 0.17.0beta
https://code.google.com/p/snova/wiki/ReleaseNotes

Original comment by yinqiwen@gmail.com on 12 Oct 2012 at 2:13

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
试过了,内存占用还是有问题,附件的图是看了3分钟左右的youtu
be的内存占用情况

Original comment by disun...@gmail.com on 14 Oct 2012 at 6:27

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
配置是默认的?

Original comment by yinqiwen@gmail.com on 14 Oct 2012 at 7:13

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
是的,默认的。上面的图是刚启动gsnova,然后打开一个视频��
�截取的

Original comment by disun...@gmail.com on 14 Oct 2012 at 7:24

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
还是InjectRange引起的问题,你可以试下把Hosts下的InjectRange注��
�掉

Original comment by yinqiwen@gmail.com on 14 Oct 2012 at 9:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
注释掉了也是一样,没有改善。只用了gae,spac和hosts都没启��
�

Original comment by disun...@gmail.com on 14 Oct 2012 at 9:55

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
那可能是另外的问题,已经修改的是Hosts问题

Original comment by yinqiwen@gmail.com on 14 Oct 2012 at 10:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
嗯,日志提示里只看到有gae.go里的。0.15版就不会这样

Original comment by disun...@gmail.com on 14 Oct 2012 at 10:26

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
感觉是不是gae.go里的rangeFetch方法的问题,比较了下0.15版,好
像主要差别在这,没细琢磨……

Original comment by disun...@gmail.com on 14 Oct 2012 at 12:18