... [scientific code] needs to be treated as a primary research output
But later it writes:
Code published in journals should be peer reviewed.
While the second quote does not specifically demote it, any code should be peer reviewed, also if not published in journals. After all, if it only applies to code with a journal article, then the scientific code is secondary research output, not primary.
At the start the manifesto writes:
But later it writes:
While the second quote does not specifically demote it, any code should be peer reviewed, also if not published in journals. After all, if it only applies to code with a journal article, then the scientific code is secondary research output, not primary.