Closed connorgr closed 8 years ago
Agree. @tacitia -- any thoughts?
To me the wordings were not self-explanatory at first, but they started to make a lot of sense once I looked at what the functions do. I also think hold() and release() have the merits of being succinct. I'm inclined to think that this won't be a problem as long as there is an API, but that's just my 2 cents.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Lane Harrison notifications@github.comwrote:
Agree. @tacitia https://github.com/tacitia -- any thoughts?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/codementum/experimentr/issues/53#issuecomment-28508703 .
I'm also swayed by the succinctness side. It's possible that we add functions in the style that @connorgr suggests that simple call hold() and release() as a first step.
Later, if we have better documentation or tutorial pages, we can introduce the hold and release concept there.
A less confusing wording might be
enableNextBtn()
anddisableNextBtn()
.